How do you know which to file in?File a case in state court or federal court....?
You can only file in federal court if you meet certain minimum criteria -- for example, either the lawsuit must involve a federal statute (called ';federal question jurisdiction';), or the person you are suing must be in a different state AND the amount of the lawsuit must be over $75,000 (called ';diversity jurisdiction';).
If you do not qualify under either federal question or diversity jurisdiction, then you must file in state court.
A few issues -- bankruptcy, admiralty, copyright -- can only be filed in federal court, because they are exclusively federal questions.File a case in state court or federal court....?
if its not a big deal than you shouldnt make a federal case out of it
Each one has some areas of law that they are interested in and some that they are not. And there will be a small amount of overlap.
Your attorney will know which court it should be filed in.
What is your lawsuit about? If we knew what it was about, we could tell you which jurisdiction to file it in.
Cory is right about the criteria of where to file - are you a lawyer?
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Do the federal courts have jurisdiction over the FDA or should the case be tried in state court?
The FDA governs food and drug in all the states so that should definitely be a federal matter I would think. What state would have jurisdiction and why that particular state?Do the federal courts have jurisdiction over the FDA or should the case be tried in state court?
The FDA is a Federal agency and so any trials would have to be in a Federal Court.Do the federal courts have jurisdiction over the FDA or should the case be tried in state court?
No, they don't. It can't be tried in state court either. It is held in a separate tribunal, which is controlled by the FDA. Congress created the FDA with the power to do this, as well as many other agencies.
i'm almost 100% positive that must be tried in the federal courts since the FDA is a federal institution
The FDA is a Federal agency and so any trials would have to be in a Federal Court.Do the federal courts have jurisdiction over the FDA or should the case be tried in state court?
No, they don't. It can't be tried in state court either. It is held in a separate tribunal, which is controlled by the FDA. Congress created the FDA with the power to do this, as well as many other agencies.
i'm almost 100% positive that must be tried in the federal courts since the FDA is a federal institution
How can I find out the details of a case regarding a federal inmate?
Is there a free way, other than asking the inmate himself?And, can I accomplish this online?
If there are no free ways, then I'd be interested in any way that I can find out the details of a case regarding a federal inmate.
I have googled the person's name; I have googled United States v. the person's name; none of that has worked. I have went to www.bop.gov, the federal of prisons website, and all they give is the persons name, and release date (I already know that). I want to know exactly why the person is in federal prison.
I'd appreciate your help.How can I find out the details of a case regarding a federal inmate?
If you can find out which court convicted him, then you should be able to pull the case file at that courthouse. You would just use their computers to search for the name of the person, and all offenses in the last ten years should appear. Click on the one you want, and give the details to the clerk.
You should be able to review the file for free (public record), but if you want copies, you will have to pay for those.
Good luck!How can I find out the details of a case regarding a federal inmate?
if you know what jail he is in you can go to their website (if they have one) and look for a link that will allow you to look up an inmate. for example, the san diego central jail has a site, you click on the link that says who is in jail and type the last name. they will show you the info and you can have a summary of charges emailed to you.
If there are no free ways, then I'd be interested in any way that I can find out the details of a case regarding a federal inmate.
I have googled the person's name; I have googled United States v. the person's name; none of that has worked. I have went to www.bop.gov, the federal of prisons website, and all they give is the persons name, and release date (I already know that). I want to know exactly why the person is in federal prison.
I'd appreciate your help.How can I find out the details of a case regarding a federal inmate?
If you can find out which court convicted him, then you should be able to pull the case file at that courthouse. You would just use their computers to search for the name of the person, and all offenses in the last ten years should appear. Click on the one you want, and give the details to the clerk.
You should be able to review the file for free (public record), but if you want copies, you will have to pay for those.
Good luck!How can I find out the details of a case regarding a federal inmate?
if you know what jail he is in you can go to their website (if they have one) and look for a link that will allow you to look up an inmate. for example, the san diego central jail has a site, you click on the link that says who is in jail and type the last name. they will show you the info and you can have a summary of charges emailed to you.
1 case involving a violation of federal law?
when george w bush was president1 case involving a violation of federal law?
[still chuckling over Richard's answer]1 case involving a violation of federal law?
While George W. Bush was President, Barack Obama ran for election as President. This was a violation of Federal law because Obama ceased to be a US citizen when he was adopted by Leo Soetoro when Obama's mother married him and moved to Indonesia.
edit.... demos is partly right and partly wrong. Being adopted as a minor by a foreign national does deprive you of your US citizenship. You can reclaim that citizenship within five years of turning 18 simply by filing the requisite paperwork. Obama never did so. He returned to the US before he reached 18 on his mothers passport, and simply never bothered.
Why do you think it was a campaign official for the *Democratic* Party in PA that started the whole ';Obama was born in Kenya'; rumor mill, and not a Republican? The answer is simple, since Obama *was* born in Hawaii, they started the whole 'birther' fiasco to draw attention away from the real citizenship question.
Richard
Boumediene v. Bush
Hey Rick, to bad your mom didn't have an abortion. The conservatives wouldn't have had a problem with your mom doing that to you.. Cause the doctors wouldn't have considered you intelligent life....
Actually, adoption by a foreign national does not deprive one of his citizenship. All that is necessary is to reclaim one's citizenship after the age of 18.
There are countless cases involving violations of federal law. Do you want one that specifically involved George W. Bush?
[still chuckling over Richard's answer]1 case involving a violation of federal law?
While George W. Bush was President, Barack Obama ran for election as President. This was a violation of Federal law because Obama ceased to be a US citizen when he was adopted by Leo Soetoro when Obama's mother married him and moved to Indonesia.
edit.... demos is partly right and partly wrong. Being adopted as a minor by a foreign national does deprive you of your US citizenship. You can reclaim that citizenship within five years of turning 18 simply by filing the requisite paperwork. Obama never did so. He returned to the US before he reached 18 on his mothers passport, and simply never bothered.
Why do you think it was a campaign official for the *Democratic* Party in PA that started the whole ';Obama was born in Kenya'; rumor mill, and not a Republican? The answer is simple, since Obama *was* born in Hawaii, they started the whole 'birther' fiasco to draw attention away from the real citizenship question.
Richard
Boumediene v. Bush
Hey Rick, to bad your mom didn't have an abortion. The conservatives wouldn't have had a problem with your mom doing that to you.. Cause the doctors wouldn't have considered you intelligent life....
Actually, adoption by a foreign national does not deprive one of his citizenship. All that is necessary is to reclaim one's citizenship after the age of 18.
There are countless cases involving violations of federal law. Do you want one that specifically involved George W. Bush?
Would it be possible bring a case against the federal government for it's unjust laws against marijuana?
on the grounds that it is a law that was put in place because harry j anslinger spread misinformation to have it banned. presidents such as nixon and george bush waged war on drugs to promote their own political agenda's. making marijuana illegal was a political move to subjugate the ';degenerate races'; (mexicans,blacks,hispanics...) as harry j ';mudslinger'; put it in his propaganda campaign. could it be argued that it was made illegal for racist reasons and since racist acts are illegal, could some very brave lawyer sue the federal government for inciting racism? i know in the real world who ever did this would more than likely be shot or given a jury of idiots and a judge affiliated to the kkk but i'd like to hear a lawyers opinion even if it's all only hypothetical.Would it be possible bring a case against the federal government for it's unjust laws against marijuana?
You can always ';bring a case against the federal government for it's unjust laws against marijuana';.
Expect to pay a large retainer and to lose the case.Would it be possible bring a case against the federal government for it's unjust laws against marijuana?
FREE THE WEED, WE'LL ALL HAVE FREE WEED.FREE THE WEED PLANT A SEED
You can always ';bring a case against the federal government for it's unjust laws against marijuana';.
Expect to pay a large retainer and to lose the case.Would it be possible bring a case against the federal government for it's unjust laws against marijuana?
FREE THE WEED, WE'LL ALL HAVE FREE WEED.FREE THE WEED PLANT A SEED
A state supreme court refused to hear my case how long do I have to file an appeal in federal court.?
Better learn about appeals first. The way in which to seek federal relief is not an ';appeal'; at all. If you want to file a cert. petition in the U.S. Supreme Court, you get 90 days from the denial of the appeal by the state supreme court. If you didn't know enough to be able to look up that info by yourself, there is no way you will be able to file a cert petition that will even get past the clerk's office.A state supreme court refused to hear my case how long do I have to file an appeal in federal court.?
Is there a Federal issue?
Federal courts aren't just ';the next step'; above State courts.
For a Federal court to entertain an appeal of a State conviction, the appeal must raise a bona-fide issue of Federal law.
As an example, to use a famous case.....
In Miranda v Arizona, Miranda was convicted in the Arizona State courts. He appealed all the way to the AZ Supreme Court on the grounds that the confession used to convict him had been improperly obtained. The State courts denied all his appeals.
After exhausting his State appeals, he appealed to the Federal courts, claiming that his rights under the *Federal* Constitution had been violated. The Court took his case, agreed with him, and struck down his conviction. We now have cops all over the country giving ';Miranda'; warnings to those they arrest and question.
If there was no issue of *Federal* law to be argued though, the Federal courts would not have taken his case.
Richardfacial treatment
Is there a Federal issue?
Federal courts aren't just ';the next step'; above State courts.
For a Federal court to entertain an appeal of a State conviction, the appeal must raise a bona-fide issue of Federal law.
As an example, to use a famous case.....
In Miranda v Arizona, Miranda was convicted in the Arizona State courts. He appealed all the way to the AZ Supreme Court on the grounds that the confession used to convict him had been improperly obtained. The State courts denied all his appeals.
After exhausting his State appeals, he appealed to the Federal courts, claiming that his rights under the *Federal* Constitution had been violated. The Court took his case, agreed with him, and struck down his conviction. We now have cops all over the country giving ';Miranda'; warnings to those they arrest and question.
If there was no issue of *Federal* law to be argued though, the Federal courts would not have taken his case.
Richard
Federal judges and justices typically hold office for many years. Why is this the case?
Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate, as stated in the Constitution. The names of potential nominees often are recommended by senators or sometimes members of the House who are of the President's political party. The Senate Judiciary Committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for each nominee. Article III of the Constitution states that these judicial officers are appointed for a life term. The federal Judiciary, the Judicial Conference of the United States, and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts play no role in the nomination and confirmation process.
Federal judges are usually appointed for life. Why go look for another job when you can't be fired unless you get disbarred?
It is a rare honor to be appointed to such a position, and they want to keep it for as long as they can keep getting up and going to work.Federal judges and justices typically hold office for many years. Why is this the case?
Well, the supreme court is a lifetime position.Federal judges and justices typically hold office for many years. Why is this the case?
Whn the constitution was drafted, they allowed for various terms of office. Representatives serve for 2 years. Presidents for 4, senators for 6 and most federal judges have a lifetime appointment. Each of those folks has different roles and the drafters want the judiciary to be far removed from the politics of the moment, to be pure of thought in deciding questions of law, while representatives are supposed to the most responsive to the will of their constituents.
Judges has no fixed term of office.
So it won't bias their decisions. If they think that deciding a certain way could cost them their job, then they wouldn't be totally free to make unbiased rulings.
Federal judges are usually appointed for life. Why go look for another job when you can't be fired unless you get disbarred?
It is a rare honor to be appointed to such a position, and they want to keep it for as long as they can keep getting up and going to work.Federal judges and justices typically hold office for many years. Why is this the case?
Well, the supreme court is a lifetime position.Federal judges and justices typically hold office for many years. Why is this the case?
Whn the constitution was drafted, they allowed for various terms of office. Representatives serve for 2 years. Presidents for 4, senators for 6 and most federal judges have a lifetime appointment. Each of those folks has different roles and the drafters want the judiciary to be far removed from the politics of the moment, to be pure of thought in deciding questions of law, while representatives are supposed to the most responsive to the will of their constituents.
Judges has no fixed term of office.
So it won't bias their decisions. If they think that deciding a certain way could cost them their job, then they wouldn't be totally free to make unbiased rulings.
ADA Title II Case Law lawsuits where plaintiff is federal courts?
List with text of all casesADA Title II Case Law lawsuits where plaintiff is federal courts?
ADA Title II Case Law lawsuits where plaintiff is federal courts?
the right to bear arms.?
ADA Title II Case Law lawsuits where plaintiff is federal courts?
the right to bear arms.?
The court case that established the supremacy of the federal government over states was?
a. McCulloch vs. Maryland
b. Marbury vs. Madison
c. Gibbons vs. OgdenThe court case that established the supremacy of the federal government over states was?
Marbury v. Madison. But the fact is, the Tenth Amendment was then and has been violated with this ';supremacy.'; The federal jurisdiction was supposed to be limited to those powers granted in the Constitution.The court case that established the supremacy of the federal government over states was?
Probably the single one decision which established the legitimate powers of the federal government as superseding any state statutes is McCulloch v Maryland
Gibbons v. Ogden established the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.
Marbury v. Madison esablished the power of The U.S. Supreme Court (and by extension the federal court system) to review statutes. Before that decision, the supreme court did not exercise it's powers over the executive and legislative branches.
All three decisions were made by a supreme court whose chief justice was John Marshall. John Marshall shaped numerous court decisions which cemented the supremacy of federalism over states rights in the early republic.
B--only because I've heard of that one and I think Madison had something to do with the ';Federalist Papers.';
b. Marbury vs. Madison
c. Gibbons vs. OgdenThe court case that established the supremacy of the federal government over states was?
Marbury v. Madison. But the fact is, the Tenth Amendment was then and has been violated with this ';supremacy.'; The federal jurisdiction was supposed to be limited to those powers granted in the Constitution.The court case that established the supremacy of the federal government over states was?
Probably the single one decision which established the legitimate powers of the federal government as superseding any state statutes is McCulloch v Maryland
Gibbons v. Ogden established the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.
Marbury v. Madison esablished the power of The U.S. Supreme Court (and by extension the federal court system) to review statutes. Before that decision, the supreme court did not exercise it's powers over the executive and legislative branches.
All three decisions were made by a supreme court whose chief justice was John Marshall. John Marshall shaped numerous court decisions which cemented the supremacy of federalism over states rights in the early republic.
B--only because I've heard of that one and I think Madison had something to do with the ';Federalist Papers.';
Is the main purpose of the Federal reserve Sstem to protect a depositor's money in case of a bank failure.
No, but that is a desired outcome from their primary purpose of providing a ';safer, more flexible'; banking system. (see FR mission statement referenced below)
Protecting a depositors money in case of bank failure would be the main purpose of the FDIC.Is the main purpose of the Federal reserve Sstem to protect a depositor's money in case of a bank failure.
They are there to regulate the flow of money through controlling interest rates. If inflation is high they will raise interest rates to keep up with it, if we are in a recession they will lower rates to jump start the economy.Is the main purpose of the Federal reserve Sstem to protect a depositor's money in case of a bank failure.
No, the main purpose is to provide liquidity to the banking system so that large amounts of money can move thru the banking system to finance the operations of a capitalist economy.
It Is set up as a ';lender of last resort'; for the banks.
Protecting a depositors money in case of bank failure would be the main purpose of the FDIC.Is the main purpose of the Federal reserve Sstem to protect a depositor's money in case of a bank failure.
They are there to regulate the flow of money through controlling interest rates. If inflation is high they will raise interest rates to keep up with it, if we are in a recession they will lower rates to jump start the economy.Is the main purpose of the Federal reserve Sstem to protect a depositor's money in case of a bank failure.
No, the main purpose is to provide liquidity to the banking system so that large amounts of money can move thru the banking system to finance the operations of a capitalist economy.
It Is set up as a ';lender of last resort'; for the banks.
What can I do, to obtain the digital recordings of my federal magistrates court case, (Melbourne)?
For 10 months I've attempted to obtain the digital recordings of my hearing in the Federal magistrates court, where the reasons for judgement where full of fraud.
No lawyer has or is willing to assist me in getting the recordings.
I was self represented during the hearing,( couldn't find a lawyer who'd take my case on).
I have written to every government department concerned and even protested my matter on the city streets.
My 2 children are being kept from me with the judgement made at that hearing.
The proof of this disgracefull act is in the recordings of the case.
This could happen to anyone as it's happened to me and I did nothing except marry someone who has friends in high places.
What about my children who've been traumatised with all this?
Please only helpful answers as this has also effected my health in a big way.What can I do, to obtain the digital recordings of my federal magistrates court case, (Melbourne)?
Try speaking to one of the librarians at the State Library of Victoria who specialise in legal aid. The LIAC (Legal Information Access Centre) librarian will be able to assist you with your search and may be able to identify whether or not this is an impossible request.
No lawyer has or is willing to assist me in getting the recordings.
I was self represented during the hearing,( couldn't find a lawyer who'd take my case on).
I have written to every government department concerned and even protested my matter on the city streets.
My 2 children are being kept from me with the judgement made at that hearing.
The proof of this disgracefull act is in the recordings of the case.
This could happen to anyone as it's happened to me and I did nothing except marry someone who has friends in high places.
What about my children who've been traumatised with all this?
Please only helpful answers as this has also effected my health in a big way.What can I do, to obtain the digital recordings of my federal magistrates court case, (Melbourne)?
Try speaking to one of the librarians at the State Library of Victoria who specialise in legal aid. The LIAC (Legal Information Access Centre) librarian will be able to assist you with your search and may be able to identify whether or not this is an impossible request.
If i sue a WI county if federal court and the case is dismissed how long do I have to sue again in state court
Appeal the case to the higher court usually within 15 days from the date of dismissal.facial treatment
When may a federal court hear a case? (bases of jurisdiction)?
When an offense violates federal statutes or occurs within federal jurisdiction, ie National Parks/Federal property such as VA Centers, etc.
Basis for jurisdiction is federal law or geographic location.
Basis for jurisdiction is federal law or geographic location.
Suppose youre an attorney. in a case youre presenting to a federal court, you argue that the person you are?
defending suffered cruel and unusual punishment. which amendment of the constitutionshould you citeSuppose youre an attorney. in a case youre presenting to a federal court, you argue that the person you are?
the 8th amendment is the amendment dealing with cruel and unusual punishment. If you are arguing in federal court that the state court imposed a cruel and unusual punishment, you will also need to cite the 14th amendment which states that the amendments apply to states as well as the feds.Suppose youre an attorney. in a case youre presenting to a federal court, you argue that the person you are?
The 8th Amendment.
the 8th amendment is the amendment dealing with cruel and unusual punishment. If you are arguing in federal court that the state court imposed a cruel and unusual punishment, you will also need to cite the 14th amendment which states that the amendments apply to states as well as the feds.Suppose youre an attorney. in a case youre presenting to a federal court, you argue that the person you are?
The 8th Amendment.
United States Court Of Federal Claims. (My Case)?
My Court,case is just in the Motions in The United States Court Of Federal Claims,Case- No.09-208.I have charge The United States for 1.Breach of agreement 2.Slander 3.Sexual Harassment 4.Perjury 5.Defamation of Character 6.Conspiracy 7.Fraud/False Statements 8.Wrongful Termination of Employment I have asked for 300,000,000 in damage's./My case started with The E.E.O.C in Washington DC.and they have found The United States. ';Guilty'; of breaching your settlement agreement of 1996. because of this.I went from The E.E.O.C and into United States District Court of New York,State.On 03 November,2008.My Case, was dismissed from U.S.D.C because the Judge,said WRONG COURT! and forward my Case into The United States Court of Federal Claims./The D.C Judge, found The United States ';Guilty';
THE PROBLEM NOW IS. The United States ';The Defendant's'; are making a Court Motion,to have my case dismissed out of Court.
The United States are ';Guilty'; of the agreement etc. and i having all i need, to take my Case in Court with over 1,000.00 documents on this case from 1996.
WTF? The Judge (She) seems to be more for The United States and keeps pissing on my Motions.I feel.My case is going bye-bye real fast
What the very ';Sorry'; reason will The United States have to forward to The Judge.to have my Case dismissed out of court.This Court is Called The Peoples Court but,I starting to feel its Not.United States Court Of Federal Claims. (My Case)?
You have listed the charges, but you have not described the situation, what happened, why you have those charges, what your motions are that are getting denied, etc. In essence, you have provided no information with which we can even attempt to help you.United States Court Of Federal Claims. (My Case)?
Do you have a question? Your inability to communicate may be part of the problem.
Well you have listed a bunch of crap now where are the decisions from the court. Where is your attorney? You sure didn't do a Pro-Se matter here or you would have decision from the court to review.I think you are just seeking attention because most of Whit you wrote here make no clear and concise point on what you have done or what you are trying to do other the venting .Get a hold of your attorney if you have one and if this stuff is even real
THE PROBLEM NOW IS. The United States ';The Defendant's'; are making a Court Motion,to have my case dismissed out of Court.
The United States are ';Guilty'; of the agreement etc. and i having all i need, to take my Case in Court with over 1,000.00 documents on this case from 1996.
WTF? The Judge (She) seems to be more for The United States and keeps pissing on my Motions.I feel.My case is going bye-bye real fast
What the very ';Sorry'; reason will The United States have to forward to The Judge.to have my Case dismissed out of court.This Court is Called The Peoples Court but,I starting to feel its Not.United States Court Of Federal Claims. (My Case)?
You have listed the charges, but you have not described the situation, what happened, why you have those charges, what your motions are that are getting denied, etc. In essence, you have provided no information with which we can even attempt to help you.United States Court Of Federal Claims. (My Case)?
Do you have a question? Your inability to communicate may be part of the problem.
Well you have listed a bunch of crap now where are the decisions from the court. Where is your attorney? You sure didn't do a Pro-Se matter here or you would have decision from the court to review.I think you are just seeking attention because most of Whit you wrote here make no clear and concise point on what you have done or what you are trying to do other the venting .Get a hold of your attorney if you have one and if this stuff is even real
Is it true that a federal lawsuit filed in toledo is challening obamas citizenship case reads US vs B.obama?
There are several such lawsuits. Most have been dismissed but some are not yet ripe for dismissal.
What does ';arising from same set of facts'; in a case means in U. S. Federal Court?
That's a fact specific determination. Here's one way to think about it. If you are telling the story of why there is one particular claim, have you essentially told the story of why there is another claim? If so, it's probably arising from the same set of facts. Note that that's just one way to think of it and won't necessarily always lead to the right conclusion. Also keep in mind that I am not a lawyer yet and this is simply an academic answer to an academic question, not legal advice.
Federal income tax case studying!?
I am studying federal income tax right now and I am an accounting major. Professor gives us case assignment, and I don't know how to figur it out because it's a lot of information involved such as mortgage, municipal bonds, stock, and CD. Professor wants me to look at this case and answer those questions as tax consultant. However, I don't have any idea how to find answer.
Can someone give me advice. Thanks!!Federal income tax case studying!?
Finding and understanding the tax laws well enough to prepare a return is a totally different thing from being a tax consultant. Well, at least it is from where I stand.
This should go without saying...you don't normally want lose money just to save on taxes...there is a bigger picture. However, it might surprise you when you start your practice.
I think that this is the view your professor wants you to answer in...is it better to have a Muni (non-taxable) at a lower rate or a CD (taxable) at a higher rate. And, is it better to invest in other venues rather than paying off the mortgage. Think about it...does it make sense to pay (let's say) 7% on a mortgage while investing in other things with a 3% return? Sometimes it does somtimes it doesn't...you have to run the numbers.
The bottomline is what matters to a tax consultant...so what if you pay more tax as long as you end up with more money in your pocket in the end. That is a tax consultants job...it is a combination of a tax preparer and a financial planner.
It might also be surprising to you the willingness of people to pay interest instead of taxes...even if it costs them more money. And, yes most people if they pay off their mortgage will use that extra money to get in debt again.
EDIT:
Let's start simple...because it is that simple. Tax situations generally only get complex when you make them that way (you will learn this too).
If you are at this level you probably know all the rules you need for this problem, it is simply a matter of applying those rules. The tax laws aren't complex in this problem.
But, if you don't IRS.GOV under forms Pub. 17, everything you will need is right there.
Many people make the process harder than it has to be...it is simple if you do it one step at a time. A lot of math but simple.
1) Calculate the base tax rate. (that is one step at a time too)
2) Then you will need to calculate the actual cost of the loan (interest paid - tax savings from the mortgage interest= actual cost). You will have to use the base tax rate.
3) You will need to calculate the normally tax free income from the Muni and compare it to the actual cost of the loan. Which one is better?
4) And because it is your job...you need to re-calculate the numbers using the higher CD rate (that is taxable) instead of the Muni. Which of these is better?
5) Just because we are gonna be really good...you need to compare the results if he got the mortgage for 6% and paid it on the property that has 10%.
Once these steps are done you will know the following:
1) What happens doing nothing.
2) What happens with a Mortgage and a Muni
3) What happens with a Mortgage and a CD instead of a Muni
4) What happens if he pays off the higher mortgage.
With this information it isn't hard to make a decision.
And as far as I can tell the corporation doesn't come into play except for the base tax rate. That is making the assumption it is a S-Corp not a C-Corp., but it still makes little difference except how to get the money from the corporation to the owner.
See, it isn't that hard if you break it down into smaller task...you are actually doing several returns to get an answer. Consider yourself lucky...I did this back when there were no computer programs to help...just a ten key and a pencil.
I will tell you that there is nothing in the tax codes that will make this easier. And, with experince it gets a lot easier. Most of it is common sense...earn $1000 tax free in a Muni ($25000 @ 4%) or earn $1500 in a CD ($25000@ 6%) taxed at maybe 28% that is $420...which is better? This is where it might make a difference...the rates between the two and the tax rate..
Another example...the differences between the mortgages. REMEMBER it is ALWAYS a percentage...for every deductible dollar you spend you will only get pennies in return on your taxes. There is a twist here too...to get an accurate answer you would have to calculate two amortization schedules...because the rule of 78's applies to almost all loans (meaning most of the interest is paid first). This makes a difference too. Meaning with the new loan you might be paying more actual interest at 6% than you would on an old loan at 10%. (You won't find that in the tax codes either).
You should also know the rule of 72 (investment). Simply stated divide 72 by the compound interest rate and this will tell you how many years (well very close) it will take your money to double (not taking taxation into account). In 1976 I bought a new truck for $3600 cash...let's say I invested that at 6%, I would now have about $14,400 and would have paid tax on $10,800 (rough estimate actually that would be in 2012). Do you think I could buy a new truck for that amount now?
Are you starting to see the forest even though there are trees in the way?
I said all of this in my first answer...this one is just more detailed. Another thing that I think is beyond the scope of the project...as a professional you should also do a comparsion with expect inflation rates.
Hope this helps clear it up even more.Federal income tax case studying!?
All the answers are hidden here:
http://www.irs.gov/
Have Fun - I've been reading those Pubs for 20+ yrs
Let's see mortgages. Use the mortgage publication 936.
Munis, bonds, Cds, use investment publication 550.facial treatment
Can someone give me advice. Thanks!!Federal income tax case studying!?
Finding and understanding the tax laws well enough to prepare a return is a totally different thing from being a tax consultant. Well, at least it is from where I stand.
This should go without saying...you don't normally want lose money just to save on taxes...there is a bigger picture. However, it might surprise you when you start your practice.
I think that this is the view your professor wants you to answer in...is it better to have a Muni (non-taxable) at a lower rate or a CD (taxable) at a higher rate. And, is it better to invest in other venues rather than paying off the mortgage. Think about it...does it make sense to pay (let's say) 7% on a mortgage while investing in other things with a 3% return? Sometimes it does somtimes it doesn't...you have to run the numbers.
The bottomline is what matters to a tax consultant...so what if you pay more tax as long as you end up with more money in your pocket in the end. That is a tax consultants job...it is a combination of a tax preparer and a financial planner.
It might also be surprising to you the willingness of people to pay interest instead of taxes...even if it costs them more money. And, yes most people if they pay off their mortgage will use that extra money to get in debt again.
EDIT:
Let's start simple...because it is that simple. Tax situations generally only get complex when you make them that way (you will learn this too).
If you are at this level you probably know all the rules you need for this problem, it is simply a matter of applying those rules. The tax laws aren't complex in this problem.
But, if you don't IRS.GOV under forms Pub. 17, everything you will need is right there.
Many people make the process harder than it has to be...it is simple if you do it one step at a time. A lot of math but simple.
1) Calculate the base tax rate. (that is one step at a time too)
2) Then you will need to calculate the actual cost of the loan (interest paid - tax savings from the mortgage interest= actual cost). You will have to use the base tax rate.
3) You will need to calculate the normally tax free income from the Muni and compare it to the actual cost of the loan. Which one is better?
4) And because it is your job...you need to re-calculate the numbers using the higher CD rate (that is taxable) instead of the Muni. Which of these is better?
5) Just because we are gonna be really good...you need to compare the results if he got the mortgage for 6% and paid it on the property that has 10%.
Once these steps are done you will know the following:
1) What happens doing nothing.
2) What happens with a Mortgage and a Muni
3) What happens with a Mortgage and a CD instead of a Muni
4) What happens if he pays off the higher mortgage.
With this information it isn't hard to make a decision.
And as far as I can tell the corporation doesn't come into play except for the base tax rate. That is making the assumption it is a S-Corp not a C-Corp., but it still makes little difference except how to get the money from the corporation to the owner.
See, it isn't that hard if you break it down into smaller task...you are actually doing several returns to get an answer. Consider yourself lucky...I did this back when there were no computer programs to help...just a ten key and a pencil.
I will tell you that there is nothing in the tax codes that will make this easier. And, with experince it gets a lot easier. Most of it is common sense...earn $1000 tax free in a Muni ($25000 @ 4%) or earn $1500 in a CD ($25000@ 6%) taxed at maybe 28% that is $420...which is better? This is where it might make a difference...the rates between the two and the tax rate..
Another example...the differences between the mortgages. REMEMBER it is ALWAYS a percentage...for every deductible dollar you spend you will only get pennies in return on your taxes. There is a twist here too...to get an accurate answer you would have to calculate two amortization schedules...because the rule of 78's applies to almost all loans (meaning most of the interest is paid first). This makes a difference too. Meaning with the new loan you might be paying more actual interest at 6% than you would on an old loan at 10%. (You won't find that in the tax codes either).
You should also know the rule of 72 (investment). Simply stated divide 72 by the compound interest rate and this will tell you how many years (well very close) it will take your money to double (not taking taxation into account). In 1976 I bought a new truck for $3600 cash...let's say I invested that at 6%, I would now have about $14,400 and would have paid tax on $10,800 (rough estimate actually that would be in 2012). Do you think I could buy a new truck for that amount now?
Are you starting to see the forest even though there are trees in the way?
I said all of this in my first answer...this one is just more detailed. Another thing that I think is beyond the scope of the project...as a professional you should also do a comparsion with expect inflation rates.
Hope this helps clear it up even more.Federal income tax case studying!?
All the answers are hidden here:
http://www.irs.gov/
Have Fun - I've been reading those Pubs for 20+ yrs
Let's see mortgages. Use the mortgage publication 936.
Munis, bonds, Cds, use investment publication 550.
EEOC Federal vs state case, confused.?
I've had an EEOC case filed for almost 3 yrs now for disability discrimination. They still have not determined whether it will be investigated.
The first investigator assigned just yelled at me and didn't understand anything I was saying.
I complained, and the Acting DIrector called. He listened, but then forgot about me, twice. I couldn't get them to contact me again. I complained to the main office, and the Actg. Director called me again. Now he is so sweet and says I have a good case.
It's a complicated case, but it seems like that is what they do and it wouldn't be so hard for them to comprehend.
We're now down to the final gathering of information, and the EEOC man 'just' realized that I work for the state, and said he only handles Federal cases. After all this time needed to comprehend the facts, he's going to have to turn this over to someone else!
I called a few attys, they said you don't usually get an atty until the EEOC decides whether or not to file. True?EEOC Federal vs state case, confused.?
Typically, discrimination cases require that you file a complaint with the EEOC or its State counterpart as the first step in the process. It sounds like you have taken this step. The agency will decide whether to prosecute the case on your behalf or they will send you a letter authorizing you to bring a lawsuit on your own. Most complaints are not prosecuted. If you have a good case, you would probably be better off just getting the ';right to sue'; letter and proceeding on your own. The investigator sounds like he just does not want to pursue your case. The fact that you are a state employee does not deprive the EEOC of power to act. It may be true that the particular investigator you were assigned is not comfortable with cases involving the State but he/she should have known that the first time he picked up the file.EEOC Federal vs state case, confused.?
The attorney is right, you have to wait and see what EEOC decides first.
The first investigator assigned just yelled at me and didn't understand anything I was saying.
I complained, and the Acting DIrector called. He listened, but then forgot about me, twice. I couldn't get them to contact me again. I complained to the main office, and the Actg. Director called me again. Now he is so sweet and says I have a good case.
It's a complicated case, but it seems like that is what they do and it wouldn't be so hard for them to comprehend.
We're now down to the final gathering of information, and the EEOC man 'just' realized that I work for the state, and said he only handles Federal cases. After all this time needed to comprehend the facts, he's going to have to turn this over to someone else!
I called a few attys, they said you don't usually get an atty until the EEOC decides whether or not to file. True?EEOC Federal vs state case, confused.?
Typically, discrimination cases require that you file a complaint with the EEOC or its State counterpart as the first step in the process. It sounds like you have taken this step. The agency will decide whether to prosecute the case on your behalf or they will send you a letter authorizing you to bring a lawsuit on your own. Most complaints are not prosecuted. If you have a good case, you would probably be better off just getting the ';right to sue'; letter and proceeding on your own. The investigator sounds like he just does not want to pursue your case. The fact that you are a state employee does not deprive the EEOC of power to act. It may be true that the particular investigator you were assigned is not comfortable with cases involving the State but he/she should have known that the first time he picked up the file.EEOC Federal vs state case, confused.?
The attorney is right, you have to wait and see what EEOC decides first.
Federal Roads Aid Case(Victoria v Commonwealth 1926 (HCA))?
What do you think about this case?! Is it causing problems in Australian society?! and how?!Federal Roads Aid Case(Victoria v Commonwealth 1926 (HCA))?
most non-Australians would not be 'up to speed' on 'foreign law' cases---i,might suggest that it would probably be quite a bit more profitable if one would try to search the Internet further for this interesting subjectFederal Roads Aid Case(Victoria v Commonwealth 1926 (HCA))?
You would probably get a better response to your posted question if you posted this in the Australian forum as opposed to this one which is the USA one. (See the tiny flags at the bottom of the webpage? See the Australian flag? Click on that and you can post country specific questions there which will get you a better response...don't you think?)
---
Federal Roads Aid Case
(Victoria v Commonwealth 1926 (HCA)
';The High Court confirmed that specific purpose payments from the Commonwealth to the States could be directed to areas of government responsibility that were not included in formal Commonwealth responsibilities.';
---
I can see how this would be causing problems in Australian society; seems to me the government has their hands on things they should not.
most non-Australians would not be 'up to speed' on 'foreign law' cases---i,might suggest that it would probably be quite a bit more profitable if one would try to search the Internet further for this interesting subjectFederal Roads Aid Case(Victoria v Commonwealth 1926 (HCA))?
You would probably get a better response to your posted question if you posted this in the Australian forum as opposed to this one which is the USA one. (See the tiny flags at the bottom of the webpage? See the Australian flag? Click on that and you can post country specific questions there which will get you a better response...don't you think?)
---
Federal Roads Aid Case
(Victoria v Commonwealth 1926 (HCA)
';The High Court confirmed that specific purpose payments from the Commonwealth to the States could be directed to areas of government responsibility that were not included in formal Commonwealth responsibilities.';
---
I can see how this would be causing problems in Australian society; seems to me the government has their hands on things they should not.
In which Supreme Court case did the court rule that federal law takes percedence over state law in interstate ?
its 8th grade history federal law interstate transportationIn which Supreme Court case did the court rule that federal law takes percedence over state law in interstate ?
Gibbins v. Ogden (1824)In which Supreme Court case did the court rule that federal law takes percedence over state law in interstate ?
Gibbons v. Ogden was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce was granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. This meant that federal law takes precedence over state law in interstate commerce.
i think it was gibbins vs. ogden (sp?)-- i know that deals with state commerce..facial treatment
Gibbins v. Ogden (1824)In which Supreme Court case did the court rule that federal law takes percedence over state law in interstate ?
Gibbons v. Ogden was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce was granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. This meant that federal law takes precedence over state law in interstate commerce.
i think it was gibbins vs. ogden (sp?)-- i know that deals with state commerce..
Is there a time frame that a judge has to make a decision in federal court if a case can remain or be tossed.?
was submitted to court nov 6 has been three months waiting for a decision from the judgeIs there a time frame that a judge has to make a decision in federal court if a case can remain or be tossed.?
Not really. Depends on complexity of case AND the court schedule at your district AND whether the chief justice uses a lash to ensure the stable write their reasons in an expeditious matter. Atty will know this stuff - it is the daily bread 'n butter, after all. Frankly, from where I sit three months doesn't sound too bad. The wheels of justice these days do grind appallingly slowly. Too many fat cats weighing them down, some might say.
Not really. Depends on complexity of case AND the court schedule at your district AND whether the chief justice uses a lash to ensure the stable write their reasons in an expeditious matter. Atty will know this stuff - it is the daily bread 'n butter, after all. Frankly, from where I sit three months doesn't sound too bad. The wheels of justice these days do grind appallingly slowly. Too many fat cats weighing them down, some might say.
What is the lowest federal court, when a case comes b4 the supreme court, how might they choose to handle it ?
Lowest Federal Court is the Federal District Court. A state can have dozens of districts. The only cases that come before the Supreme Court are cases of original jurisdiction such as issues between states. This is a small % of its workload. the other 98% of its cases the court chooses to hear. They can reject an appeal from a lower court ';stare decisis'; or they can hear a case on appeal and decide there is no standing in which case the appeal evaporates or they can recommend case specifics or make a general ruling that often adds to the precedent body of rulings that establish general court trends.
Is the Cruller v. State case a federal or state case?
Is the Cruller v. State case a federal or state case considering it says:
We have for review Cruller v. State, 745 So. 2d 512, 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the First District Court of Appeal's decision in Ward v. State, 730 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 1st DCA
1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, 搂 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we conclude that double jeopardy does not bar convictions and punishments for robbery and carjacking.
Is this case a function of the federal or state court system?Is the Cruller v. State case a federal or state case?
The case is a State case that was appealed to the federal appeals court.
We have for review Cruller v. State, 745 So. 2d 512, 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the First District Court of Appeal's decision in Ward v. State, 730 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 1st DCA
1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, 搂 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we conclude that double jeopardy does not bar convictions and punishments for robbery and carjacking.
Is this case a function of the federal or state court system?Is the Cruller v. State case a federal or state case?
The case is a State case that was appealed to the federal appeals court.
What is a way federal gov't can influence the outcome of supreme court case? thanks?
Whenever the Solicitor General is a party to a case or files an amicus curiae brief the Executive Branch is almost guaranteed a measure of influence.What is a way federal gov't can influence the outcome of supreme court case? thanks?
Truly, the only branch of the federal government that SHOULD influence the outcome of the Supreme Court is the Judicial Branch (which, of course, is the branch of government in which the Supreme Court resides).
The whole reason that judges are appointed for life-time tenure is so that they are NOT influenced by outside sources to decide any one particular case.
That doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. Pressure from interest groups and leverage of public officials have an impact.What is a way federal gov't can influence the outcome of supreme court case? thanks?
There is no way for either the legislative branch or the executive branch to influence the Supreme Court in a case they are deciding. However, both branches can effect future cases. The President appoints new Supreme Court Justices, and the Senate gives consent and confirmation on those appointments. Generally the President appoints justices that agree with his views of the constitution. Therefore they could be expected rule on issues the way he/she would.
In about half the cases heard by the supreme court, the federal government is a party to the case. So obviously they influence it.
In the rest, they can file an amicus brief like anyone else.
Not sure, they can give their opinions but the SC has been known to have it's own mind on most issues, so it would be hard, the more you try to influence, the more they may go the other way.....
Teh Supreme Court is part of the federal government. The Supreme Court has total influence over its cases' outcomes.
fed can stay the hell out of it..maybe it will be better
Truly, the only branch of the federal government that SHOULD influence the outcome of the Supreme Court is the Judicial Branch (which, of course, is the branch of government in which the Supreme Court resides).
The whole reason that judges are appointed for life-time tenure is so that they are NOT influenced by outside sources to decide any one particular case.
That doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. Pressure from interest groups and leverage of public officials have an impact.What is a way federal gov't can influence the outcome of supreme court case? thanks?
There is no way for either the legislative branch or the executive branch to influence the Supreme Court in a case they are deciding. However, both branches can effect future cases. The President appoints new Supreme Court Justices, and the Senate gives consent and confirmation on those appointments. Generally the President appoints justices that agree with his views of the constitution. Therefore they could be expected rule on issues the way he/she would.
In about half the cases heard by the supreme court, the federal government is a party to the case. So obviously they influence it.
In the rest, they can file an amicus brief like anyone else.
Not sure, they can give their opinions but the SC has been known to have it's own mind on most issues, so it would be hard, the more you try to influence, the more they may go the other way.....
Teh Supreme Court is part of the federal government. The Supreme Court has total influence over its cases' outcomes.
fed can stay the hell out of it..maybe it will be better
Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
No. The courts of your filing jurisdiction would hold, unless the case has been appealed to a federal court at some junction.
If you sued a resident of Louisiana (not citizen), but filed the motion in Nebraska, then it would be heard by a Nebraska court (assuming the court did not negate its jurisdiction in the case).Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
The easy answer is no, but there is not enough information available to give you a definite answer. Diversity jurisdiction in federal court still requires the amount of controversy to be over $75,000.00 or a dispute that involves a federal question. Therefore, if the defendant is sued in state court, the case may only be removed to federal court if all of the requirements are met.Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
It doesn't have to be filed in federal court but i believe a party mile file to have it trasferred to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction.
If you sued a resident of Louisiana (not citizen), but filed the motion in Nebraska, then it would be heard by a Nebraska court (assuming the court did not negate its jurisdiction in the case).Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
The easy answer is no, but there is not enough information available to give you a definite answer. Diversity jurisdiction in federal court still requires the amount of controversy to be over $75,000.00 or a dispute that involves a federal question. Therefore, if the defendant is sued in state court, the case may only be removed to federal court if all of the requirements are met.Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
It doesn't have to be filed in federal court but i believe a party mile file to have it trasferred to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction.
What is the lowest federal court, when a case comes b4 the supreme court, how might they choose to handle it ?
Lowest Federal Court is the Federal District Court. A state can have dozens of districts. The only cases that come before the Supreme Court are cases of original jurisdiction such as issues between states. This is a small % of its workload. the other 98% of its cases the court chooses to hear. They can reject an appeal from a lower court ';stare decisis'; or they can hear a case on appeal and decide there is no standing in which case the appeal evaporates or they can recommend case specifics or make a general ruling that often adds to the precedent body of rulings that establish general court trends.facial treatment
Is the Cruller v. State case a federal or state case?
Is the Cruller v. State case a federal or state case considering it says:
We have for review Cruller v. State, 745 So. 2d 512, 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the First District Court of Appeal's decision in Ward v. State, 730 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 1st DCA
1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, 搂 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we conclude that double jeopardy does not bar convictions and punishments for robbery and carjacking.
Is this case a function of the federal or state court system?Is the Cruller v. State case a federal or state case?
The case is a State case that was appealed to the federal appeals court.
We have for review Cruller v. State, 745 So. 2d 512, 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the First District Court of Appeal's decision in Ward v. State, 730 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 1st DCA
1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, 搂 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we conclude that double jeopardy does not bar convictions and punishments for robbery and carjacking.
Is this case a function of the federal or state court system?Is the Cruller v. State case a federal or state case?
The case is a State case that was appealed to the federal appeals court.
What is a way federal gov't can influence the outcome of supreme court case? thanks?
Whenever the Solicitor General is a party to a case or files an amicus curiae brief the Executive Branch is almost guaranteed a measure of influence.What is a way federal gov't can influence the outcome of supreme court case? thanks?
Truly, the only branch of the federal government that SHOULD influence the outcome of the Supreme Court is the Judicial Branch (which, of course, is the branch of government in which the Supreme Court resides).
The whole reason that judges are appointed for life-time tenure is so that they are NOT influenced by outside sources to decide any one particular case.
That doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. Pressure from interest groups and leverage of public officials have an impact.What is a way federal gov't can influence the outcome of supreme court case? thanks?
There is no way for either the legislative branch or the executive branch to influence the Supreme Court in a case they are deciding. However, both branches can effect future cases. The President appoints new Supreme Court Justices, and the Senate gives consent and confirmation on those appointments. Generally the President appoints justices that agree with his views of the constitution. Therefore they could be expected rule on issues the way he/she would.
In about half the cases heard by the supreme court, the federal government is a party to the case. So obviously they influence it.
In the rest, they can file an amicus brief like anyone else.
Not sure, they can give their opinions but the SC has been known to have it's own mind on most issues, so it would be hard, the more you try to influence, the more they may go the other way.....
Teh Supreme Court is part of the federal government. The Supreme Court has total influence over its cases' outcomes.
fed can stay the hell out of it..maybe it will be better
Truly, the only branch of the federal government that SHOULD influence the outcome of the Supreme Court is the Judicial Branch (which, of course, is the branch of government in which the Supreme Court resides).
The whole reason that judges are appointed for life-time tenure is so that they are NOT influenced by outside sources to decide any one particular case.
That doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. Pressure from interest groups and leverage of public officials have an impact.What is a way federal gov't can influence the outcome of supreme court case? thanks?
There is no way for either the legislative branch or the executive branch to influence the Supreme Court in a case they are deciding. However, both branches can effect future cases. The President appoints new Supreme Court Justices, and the Senate gives consent and confirmation on those appointments. Generally the President appoints justices that agree with his views of the constitution. Therefore they could be expected rule on issues the way he/she would.
In about half the cases heard by the supreme court, the federal government is a party to the case. So obviously they influence it.
In the rest, they can file an amicus brief like anyone else.
Not sure, they can give their opinions but the SC has been known to have it's own mind on most issues, so it would be hard, the more you try to influence, the more they may go the other way.....
Teh Supreme Court is part of the federal government. The Supreme Court has total influence over its cases' outcomes.
fed can stay the hell out of it..maybe it will be better
Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
No. The courts of your filing jurisdiction would hold, unless the case has been appealed to a federal court at some junction.
If you sued a resident of Louisiana (not citizen), but filed the motion in Nebraska, then it would be heard by a Nebraska court (assuming the court did not negate its jurisdiction in the case).Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
The easy answer is no, but there is not enough information available to give you a definite answer. Diversity jurisdiction in federal court still requires the amount of controversy to be over $75,000.00 or a dispute that involves a federal question. Therefore, if the defendant is sued in state court, the case may only be removed to federal court if all of the requirements are met.Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
It doesn't have to be filed in federal court but i believe a party mile file to have it trasferred to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction.
If you sued a resident of Louisiana (not citizen), but filed the motion in Nebraska, then it would be heard by a Nebraska court (assuming the court did not negate its jurisdiction in the case).Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
The easy answer is no, but there is not enough information available to give you a definite answer. Diversity jurisdiction in federal court still requires the amount of controversy to be over $75,000.00 or a dispute that involves a federal question. Therefore, if the defendant is sued in state court, the case may only be removed to federal court if all of the requirements are met.Must a case in which a resident of Nebraska sues a citizen of Louisiana be heard in a federal court?
It doesn't have to be filed in federal court but i believe a party mile file to have it trasferred to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction.
Im looking for a list of doctor names that treat Federal Workers' Comp case I'm looking for a dr in Natchez Ms
looking for Dr's in Natchez Ms who treat workers' comp injury casesIm looking for a list of doctor names that treat Federal Workers' Comp case I'm looking for a dr in Natchez Ms
Call your local Hospital and ask for Medical Records. Tell them that you are new to the town, and you need a doctor who will treat Federal Workers' Comp case. They can't refer you to a specific one, but they will usually give you three to choose from...
Call your local Hospital and ask for Medical Records. Tell them that you are new to the town, and you need a doctor who will treat Federal Workers' Comp case. They can't refer you to a specific one, but they will usually give you three to choose from...
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Is it true that federal and state courts may have concurrent jurisdiction over a case?
I dint know. I dint care too...Is it true that federal and state courts may have concurrent jurisdiction over a case?
Yep ... but the lawsuit can only be filed in ONE or the OTHER. If a Plaintiff files in state court (for example), a defendant can remove the lawsuit to federal court ... if they want.
Civil rights actions under 42 USC 1983 are a prime example....
Yep ... but the lawsuit can only be filed in ONE or the OTHER. If a Plaintiff files in state court (for example), a defendant can remove the lawsuit to federal court ... if they want.
Civil rights actions under 42 USC 1983 are a prime example....
Can you sue if the federal fugitive case was dismissed? True, present situation. Need help pls....?
Case was dismissed, bail was returned, went to another country, arrested, marshal brought me back to the US, federal case was dismissed on the motion of both parties, still in detention for charges. How to sue, what kind of lawyer, please... Thank you for your help.Can you sue if the federal fugitive case was dismissed? True, present situation. Need help pls....?
As far as I know, you can't sue the federal government or its agencies.facial treatment
As far as I know, you can't sue the federal government or its agencies.
Which of the following could be the subject of a crimial case tried in federal court?
a. bankruptcy
b. civil rights
c. counterfeiting
d. labor relationsWhich of the following could be the subject of a crimial case tried in federal court?
Yes, C is correct. In fact, it's the only crime on there. Bankruptcy, civil rights and labor relations cases are all civil cases.Which of the following could be the subject of a crimial case tried in federal court?
c. counterfeiting
I think this may only be a federal offense - states don't print their own currency
bankruptcy
b. civil rights
c. counterfeiting
d. labor relationsWhich of the following could be the subject of a crimial case tried in federal court?
Yes, C is correct. In fact, it's the only crime on there. Bankruptcy, civil rights and labor relations cases are all civil cases.Which of the following could be the subject of a crimial case tried in federal court?
c. counterfeiting
I think this may only be a federal offense - states don't print their own currency
bankruptcy
How do I get an attorney to take on a case, when they are afraid of the Federal Gov. On cons. Not Civil Law,?
If a lawyer doesn't want to take your case, there isn't much you can do to force the issue on the lawyer. Try looking for another lawyer. http://www.martindale.com/How do I get an attorney to take on a case, when they are afraid of the Federal Gov. On cons. Not Civil Law,?
find a lawyer who will fight for the caseHow do I get an attorney to take on a case, when they are afraid of the Federal Gov. On cons. Not Civil Law,?
Try calling American Civil Liberties Union for guidance.
find a lawyer who will fight for the caseHow do I get an attorney to take on a case, when they are afraid of the Federal Gov. On cons. Not Civil Law,?
Try calling American Civil Liberties Union for guidance.
Current Federal Court Case? ?
I need to find an article on a current federal court case in the U.S, does anyone have any stories or websites I could check out. Current Federal Court Case? ?
A very recent U.S. Supreme Court case http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008鈥?/a>
on a 5-4 Republican majority vote gave protection to medical device manufacturers to sell defective medical devices. Trial lawyers hate this.
A very recent U.S. Supreme Court case http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008鈥?/a>
on a 5-4 Republican majority vote gave protection to medical device manufacturers to sell defective medical devices. Trial lawyers hate this.
How do i find federal court case archives?
47f.3d164 {esposito v. davisHow do i find federal court case archives?
You need to go to the court in person and ask the clerk to inspect the records. If it's a more recent case, the court's website may have a copy for download. Either way, the court's website will tell you the procedure and fees.How do i find federal court case archives?
try justice.com.
You need to go to the court in person and ask the clerk to inspect the records. If it's a more recent case, the court's website may have a copy for download. Either way, the court's website will tell you the procedure and fees.How do i find federal court case archives?
try justice.com.
Which of the following is not a case that usually would be heard in a federal court?
a) dispute over patent rights
b) a dispute over child support
c)a suit involving the u.s. defense department
d)a case involving a violation of the freedom of speechWhich of the following is not a case that usually would be heard in a federal court?
B. would not be heard in Federal court unless there is an international issue involved. A. would not likely be heard in a Federal again unless there is an international issue involved.Which of the following is not a case that usually would be heard in a federal court?
';C';
child support
b) a dispute over child support
c)a suit involving the u.s. defense department
d)a case involving a violation of the freedom of speechWhich of the following is not a case that usually would be heard in a federal court?
B. would not be heard in Federal court unless there is an international issue involved. A. would not likely be heard in a Federal again unless there is an international issue involved.Which of the following is not a case that usually would be heard in a federal court?
';C';
child support
Why former Perak MB Niza still have not go to Federal court to appeal againt Zambry case?
No element and sentiment of seditious,inciting racial hatred and prejudice againt any race and party or any group or royalty, just asking feedback.thanksWhy former Perak MB Niza still have not go to Federal court to appeal againt Zambry case?
Not so sure about it. Maybe he has other plans or strategies. But for me right now he should focus more on doing his job as an MP. Let the court decides his fate.Why former Perak MB Niza still have not go to Federal court to appeal againt Zambry case?
Because the Sultan have taken the wright action according to Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Negeri Perak which was revealed by the High Court recently. If he want to saman the Sultan could it works.
Suruh dia duduk diam-diam sajalah. Cukup bulan ambil alaun MP sudahlah jangan cari pasal nanti kalau kalah lagi malu laa.
No need la. Waste of time. Sure lost la. Better he concentrate with Bukit Gatang parliamentary
This is just one of the many games called POLITIC.facial treatment
Not so sure about it. Maybe he has other plans or strategies. But for me right now he should focus more on doing his job as an MP. Let the court decides his fate.Why former Perak MB Niza still have not go to Federal court to appeal againt Zambry case?
Because the Sultan have taken the wright action according to Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Negeri Perak which was revealed by the High Court recently. If he want to saman the Sultan could it works.
Suruh dia duduk diam-diam sajalah. Cukup bulan ambil alaun MP sudahlah jangan cari pasal nanti kalau kalah lagi malu laa.
No need la. Waste of time. Sure lost la. Better he concentrate with Bukit Gatang parliamentary
This is just one of the many games called POLITIC.
My attorney succesfully got my case moved to federal court. He said this was a better 'Jury Pool'....?
What is a jury pool? I realized this 5 minutes after we got off the phone that I had no idea what that meantMy attorney succesfully got my case moved to federal court. He said this was a better 'Jury Pool'....?
It's the group of people that are selected for jury duty on your case... if you're in a rural county, for example, you will get mainly retirees or other county residents that are eligible for jury duty. All white, middle class county, all white, middle class jury, because that's who lives there.
A federal jury pool calls for a wider net of people, as they can issue a jury summons to a bigger geographic area. So you can have an ethnic mix, for sure, and usually a wider economic base, they could go from lower class to millionaires.My attorney succesfully got my case moved to federal court. He said this was a better 'Jury Pool'....?
Good luck with your case, thanks for the 10 points.. Suz
A jury pool is the group of potential jurors that will be called in for jury duty. What your attorney means is that the area from which the federal jury pool will be selected contains those your attorney feels will be more sympathetic to your case as opposed to the jury pool in the county where the matter was originally being heard.
If you have a trial, a jury has to be selected. The ';pool'; is the group of people who are summoned by the court for selection.
A jury pool is the group of people that the jury will be selected from.
Jury pool is made up of the people who could be chosen to sit on your jury.
It's the group of people that are selected for jury duty on your case... if you're in a rural county, for example, you will get mainly retirees or other county residents that are eligible for jury duty. All white, middle class county, all white, middle class jury, because that's who lives there.
A federal jury pool calls for a wider net of people, as they can issue a jury summons to a bigger geographic area. So you can have an ethnic mix, for sure, and usually a wider economic base, they could go from lower class to millionaires.My attorney succesfully got my case moved to federal court. He said this was a better 'Jury Pool'....?
Good luck with your case, thanks for the 10 points.. Suz
Report Abuse
A jury pool is the group of potential jurors that will be called in for jury duty. What your attorney means is that the area from which the federal jury pool will be selected contains those your attorney feels will be more sympathetic to your case as opposed to the jury pool in the county where the matter was originally being heard.
If you have a trial, a jury has to be selected. The ';pool'; is the group of people who are summoned by the court for selection.
A jury pool is the group of people that the jury will be selected from.
Jury pool is made up of the people who could be chosen to sit on your jury.
How do i put a legal case in federal court?
there are generally two basis for federal jurisdiction: diversity of citizenship between the parties and federal question.
Can we access federal court case information online??
If you know someone facing federal criminal charges, anyway to look online to see the FEDERAL charges against her?Can we access federal court case information online??
Yes. PACER.Can we access federal court case information online??
See the website below for information on the Freedom of Information Act...
A better way than pacer (which costs money ) would be to call up the court and speak to the clerk. Pacer requires registration and money
yes
Yes. PACER.Can we access federal court case information online??
See the website below for information on the Freedom of Information Act...
A better way than pacer (which costs money ) would be to call up the court and speak to the clerk. Pacer requires registration and money
yes
How do move legal case in federal court?
Appeal the judgement of the federal court to the higher court if you want to move the case.How do move legal case in federal court?
Say what? You need to retype this question with proper grammar.How do move legal case in federal court?
Are you being charged by the word?
Your question is too poorly written to answer.
What is the federal issue that applies to your case?
If you're just a common criminal, that's a state matter.
Say what? You need to retype this question with proper grammar.How do move legal case in federal court?
Are you being charged by the word?
Your question is too poorly written to answer.
What is the federal issue that applies to your case?
If you're just a common criminal, that's a state matter.
Can I sue for Prima Facie Case in Federal Court? Yes or No and why and why not!?
Your question is confusing. Prima Facie means ';a matter appears to be self-evident from the facts.';
To file a lawsuit in any court, your lawsuit would have to have a cognizable claim under law and you would have to detail the essential evidence of the case. The essential details are your claim and the evidence you present to the court in your filing that shows that your suit has merit and that you can continue with the case to a ruling. If you can not show prima facie evidence in your motion, the case would be dismissed and not proceed to trial.
Let's say Obama called me out in a press conference and called me an ';American Nazi';. I could bring suit in Federal court for defamation and in my filing I would have to provide certain evidence for my case to continue. I would have to prove that Obama lives in DC and I live in Illinois, thus we have an issue for a Federal Court Jurisdiction. I would have to show proof that Obama defamed me. Luckily for me, the term ';Nazi'; is so defamatory that is would be considered by most courts to be per se defamation. Once I have shown this evidence, then I will have met my prima facie burden to the court for the suit to continue to trial.
whaleCan I sue for Prima Facie Case in Federal Court? Yes or No and why and why not!?
Of course you can sue. It is the right of every person in the United States to have matters in controversy brought before the courts.
Under federal rules and under state rules, some persons may be barred from repeatedly filing frivolous lawsuits, but that affects only a few dozen people.
To file a lawsuit in any court, your lawsuit would have to have a cognizable claim under law and you would have to detail the essential evidence of the case. The essential details are your claim and the evidence you present to the court in your filing that shows that your suit has merit and that you can continue with the case to a ruling. If you can not show prima facie evidence in your motion, the case would be dismissed and not proceed to trial.
Let's say Obama called me out in a press conference and called me an ';American Nazi';. I could bring suit in Federal court for defamation and in my filing I would have to provide certain evidence for my case to continue. I would have to prove that Obama lives in DC and I live in Illinois, thus we have an issue for a Federal Court Jurisdiction. I would have to show proof that Obama defamed me. Luckily for me, the term ';Nazi'; is so defamatory that is would be considered by most courts to be per se defamation. Once I have shown this evidence, then I will have met my prima facie burden to the court for the suit to continue to trial.
whaleCan I sue for Prima Facie Case in Federal Court? Yes or No and why and why not!?
Of course you can sue. It is the right of every person in the United States to have matters in controversy brought before the courts.
Under federal rules and under state rules, some persons may be barred from repeatedly filing frivolous lawsuits, but that affects only a few dozen people.
I'm trying to research a federal court case that is pending: Winnicki v. Bennigans?
There are eleven different district courts for the United States, as well as one for the District of Columbia, and bankruptcy courts in all districts, and regional Courts of Appeal. Try FindLaw.com under Federal Resources and register for PACER (public access court electronic records) by going to Google and searching ';Pacer Web Links'; to get to the subscribe page. It costs 8 cents a page to download and view documents from current cases. You need to supply a debit or credit card number.facial treatment
The federal fugitive case dismissed? Can I sue?
Yes you can sue pursuant to 42 U.S.C. (United States Code)Section 1983. ';Section 1983 authorizes a court to grant relief when a party's federally protected rights have been violated by a state or local official or other person who acted under the color of law.';
Get yourself an attorney that handles this type of case. You can contact your local bar association for attorney information, as well as, their contact information.
Good Luck!The federal fugitive case dismissed? Can I sue?
Sue who? For what?
Probably not -- because federal officers have immunity for actions carried out in the course of their duties. But a few more specifics -- like any -- are necessary before we can answer your question.The federal fugitive case dismissed? Can I sue?
i am pretty sure u can!!
Not enough details, Normally the judge and the DA are exempt from law suits if they acted upon reasonable care.
And if the case went to the grand jury, then there would be no case for case.
YES
if YOU are not specifically harmed by tit then you cannot even use because you lack standing[1].
Also you cannot sue Judges for their decisions -- they have immunity.[2]
If you want to sue the FUGITIVE -- you can try, talk to your lawyer.
Get yourself an attorney that handles this type of case. You can contact your local bar association for attorney information, as well as, their contact information.
Good Luck!The federal fugitive case dismissed? Can I sue?
Sue who? For what?
Probably not -- because federal officers have immunity for actions carried out in the course of their duties. But a few more specifics -- like any -- are necessary before we can answer your question.The federal fugitive case dismissed? Can I sue?
i am pretty sure u can!!
Not enough details, Normally the judge and the DA are exempt from law suits if they acted upon reasonable care.
And if the case went to the grand jury, then there would be no case for case.
YES
if YOU are not specifically harmed by tit then you cannot even use because you lack standing[1].
Also you cannot sue Judges for their decisions -- they have immunity.[2]
If you want to sue the FUGITIVE -- you can try, talk to your lawyer.
Can an alleged case of sexual harassment be considered a federal offence? Why?
No. Because it is Alleged. It would have to be a convicted crime before it can be considered anything. In 1998 the Supreme court came out with a set of guidelines as to what Sexual Harassment is and how a company should handle it. But in each case there has to be an investigation and if the harassment exceeded the company's policy appropriate action would be taken. But in most cases (unless rape was involved) it remains as a misdemeanor at most. Most cases are considered civil not criminal offenses.Can an alleged case of sexual harassment be considered a federal offence? Why?
Yes, it can. There are three provisions in the Federal Code that address sexual harassment.
Sexual harassment can be used as a mechanism for depriving someone of their protected rights. This is ';why.';Can an alleged case of sexual harassment be considered a federal offence? Why?
only upon conviction in a federal court
yes, its a bias crime.
Yes, it can. There are three provisions in the Federal Code that address sexual harassment.
Sexual harassment can be used as a mechanism for depriving someone of their protected rights. This is ';why.';Can an alleged case of sexual harassment be considered a federal offence? Why?
only upon conviction in a federal court
yes, its a bias crime.
Do federal inmates have a ';right'; to access a public notary? If so, is there any case law backing it?
if the prevlage is eraned with in his status and there is no law backing it
Where can I find Federal Court Decision on Morales Feliciano case regarding inmates living conditions in PR?
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/ge鈥?/a>
On what basis might a federal district court exercise jurisdiction in a breach of contract case?
The parties are in separate states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
How do i go about moving a legal case in federal court?
I think your question is a little too vague.. please include a little more information.. the specifics of the case, what and/or how you want to move it, and we'll be able to help you out.facial treatment
If you dismiss a civil case in Georgia without prejudice how long do you have to refile in Federal court ?
If you are wanting to transfer to Federal court, do not dismiss the State case in GA, request/motion for a transfer to Federal that way you do not loose your statute of limitations protection. Everything has a statute of limitations and if you dismiss your GA case the clock is still ticking from the date of the incident. You have to file before the deadline of the statute of limitations or you are SOL. Like with Personal Injury cases. Most States you have 1 year to file your lawsuit some are 2 years. Good luck
If we loose a federal copy-write case, what can they take from us?
My wife has a pending case for selling embroidery designs on e-bay. She olny sold a few, but the case is for $4,000,000. We cant afford an atourney. If we loose, what can they take? Most everything around here is owned by the bank.
ThanxIf we loose a federal copy-write case, what can they take from us?
Prob need a lawyer if you dont have one. a simple we dont own anything, only a few designs were sold, we agree to never use the design again etc... also some kind of a statement showing that it would cost the company or person who is sueing more money to continue with the law suit than they can possibly get out of you might be a convincing factor.
Honestly thats about all they can really do anyway.
ThanxIf we loose a federal copy-write case, what can they take from us?
Prob need a lawyer if you dont have one. a simple we dont own anything, only a few designs were sold, we agree to never use the design again etc... also some kind of a statement showing that it would cost the company or person who is sueing more money to continue with the law suit than they can possibly get out of you might be a convincing factor.
Honestly thats about all they can really do anyway.
About how much would it cost to hire a lawyer for litigation on a Federal case of trademark infringement?
If I were to decide to sue someone for trademark infringement, how much am I looking at to pay lawyers to go to litigation? Also, if I were to win; can I expect some statutory fines to be awarded to me under the Lanham act even though the infringer did not make any profits off of the trademark infringement of purchasing a domain with my trade mark in it? He has a website being created that looked like it was going to compete with mine, but it was not completed yet and did not gain any revenues.About how much would it cost to hire a lawyer for litigation on a Federal case of trademark infringement?
Did you actually file for trademark protection?
Or was your trademark simply through useage?
A Trademark/Patent ( intellectual property) attorney depending on where he is located, can be costly. I prosecuted a patent infringement case in NY and paid $500 per hour and that was back in 1992.
The defendant crossfiled charging patent fraud ( a common defense) and the bills ran very, very high.
Very, very, very, very, very, high.
Anyone got oxygen - please.
Did you actually file for trademark protection?
Or was your trademark simply through useage?
A Trademark/Patent ( intellectual property) attorney depending on where he is located, can be costly. I prosecuted a patent infringement case in NY and paid $500 per hour and that was back in 1992.
The defendant crossfiled charging patent fraud ( a common defense) and the bills ran very, very high.
Very, very, very, very, very, high.
Anyone got oxygen - please.
My brother was given a bond in court yesturday (this is a federal case and the charges they have brought up?
are very small) well he was granted a 10,000 bond and has to wear the ankle monitor and all....the prosicution decided to appeal the bond today they are withholding the information as to why they are appealing the bond....is this something I should worry about because they objected the bond yesturday and the judge still granted it.My brother was given a bond in court yesturday (this is a federal case and the charges they have brought up?
This may mean they have additional information or evidence about the case that puts your brother in a different light. This does not sound good.My brother was given a bond in court yesturday (this is a federal case and the charges they have brought up?
this is something i know a little bit about. being a concerned family member that is.
its normal to worry about your brother, as for the case the charges have been laid and the bond granted. I don't know what he has done so I really can't give much advice. If possible try to re-appeal the case when able, and just be there for him and let him know you love him no matter what.
Time really does heal all, including bad behavior. if he learns from what he has done people will see that and go easy on him. best of luck :)
This may mean they have additional information or evidence about the case that puts your brother in a different light. This does not sound good.My brother was given a bond in court yesturday (this is a federal case and the charges they have brought up?
this is something i know a little bit about. being a concerned family member that is.
its normal to worry about your brother, as for the case the charges have been laid and the bond granted. I don't know what he has done so I really can't give much advice. If possible try to re-appeal the case when able, and just be there for him and let him know you love him no matter what.
Time really does heal all, including bad behavior. if he learns from what he has done people will see that and go easy on him. best of luck :)
How can my fiance get a fair trial in A Federal Case that he did not do.?
He was charged back in 2007 with possession of a Firearm by a convicted felon in which he did nothing wrong but he admitted to do so. I was able to look up his case on-line and something stood out to me how can i convince him or someone else that he was wrongly convicted and get him set freeHow can my fiance get a fair trial in A Federal Case that he did not do.?
';he admitted to do so.';
He was convicted because he said he did it.
Not much you can do about that.
If he now says he didn't do it, then he is lying, either then or now.How can my fiance get a fair trial in A Federal Case that he did not do.?
You didn't give a great deal of information in this case, and I am NOT giving you specific legal advice. I presume that your fiance has an attorney. If he doesn't, then for specific legal advice, he needs to consult an attorney who specializes in federal criminal defense in your jurisdiction.
In general, when one pleads guilty, the judge makes a series of findings. This includes, (but is not an exhaustive list), that the person is pleading guilty voluntarily, and because they are indeed guilty. He/she makes sure that the person understands that they are pleading guilty, they are not doing so because of some , and that there is indeed a basis for the guilty plea.. i.e there has to be some evidence that a crime was committed and that the defendant in fact committed the crime.
If you are dealing with a conviction, then he has either already had a trial and was convicted at trial, or he pled guilty. No way to know since you weren't specific. Overturning a conviction, assuming that the trial court heard from witnesses and the judge or jury had an opportunity to determine their credibility, is incredibly difficult if there were no other difficulties in the trial.
As I said earlier, if your fiancee doesn't already have a laywer, he will need to obtain counsel to have any hope of getting the specific legal questions answered. For a referral, contact your local or state bar association.
Can't.
In Federal Court, Juries are unlawfully instructed to judge ONLY the facts. They can't reason that there was no crime in the first place. They are told that if they believe the Prosecutor's story HAPPENED, the defendant is guilty.
Federal Juries OFTEN ';convict'; defendants even when what they DID isn't illegal in the first place so don't hold your breath looking for a loophole.
If he admitted to it and pled guilty there is no way out of it. When you plead guilty the Judge asks you if you willingly plead guilty and explains to you the rights you are giving up by doing so.
Lawyer.
Period. he already had a fair trial. He admitted it.
I wouldn't hold my breath.
Talk to his Lawyer is where you need to start. But remember you better have a good case because 90% of people in prison claim their innocent.
If he admitted it and plead guilty, that's it.
';he admitted to do so.';
He was convicted because he said he did it.
Not much you can do about that.
If he now says he didn't do it, then he is lying, either then or now.How can my fiance get a fair trial in A Federal Case that he did not do.?
You didn't give a great deal of information in this case, and I am NOT giving you specific legal advice. I presume that your fiance has an attorney. If he doesn't, then for specific legal advice, he needs to consult an attorney who specializes in federal criminal defense in your jurisdiction.
In general, when one pleads guilty, the judge makes a series of findings. This includes, (but is not an exhaustive list), that the person is pleading guilty voluntarily, and because they are indeed guilty. He/she makes sure that the person understands that they are pleading guilty, they are not doing so because of some , and that there is indeed a basis for the guilty plea.. i.e there has to be some evidence that a crime was committed and that the defendant in fact committed the crime.
If you are dealing with a conviction, then he has either already had a trial and was convicted at trial, or he pled guilty. No way to know since you weren't specific. Overturning a conviction, assuming that the trial court heard from witnesses and the judge or jury had an opportunity to determine their credibility, is incredibly difficult if there were no other difficulties in the trial.
As I said earlier, if your fiancee doesn't already have a laywer, he will need to obtain counsel to have any hope of getting the specific legal questions answered. For a referral, contact your local or state bar association.
Can't.
In Federal Court, Juries are unlawfully instructed to judge ONLY the facts. They can't reason that there was no crime in the first place. They are told that if they believe the Prosecutor's story HAPPENED, the defendant is guilty.
Federal Juries OFTEN ';convict'; defendants even when what they DID isn't illegal in the first place so don't hold your breath looking for a loophole.
If he admitted to it and pled guilty there is no way out of it. When you plead guilty the Judge asks you if you willingly plead guilty and explains to you the rights you are giving up by doing so.
Lawyer.
Period. he already had a fair trial. He admitted it.
I wouldn't hold my breath.
Talk to his Lawyer is where you need to start. But remember you better have a good case because 90% of people in prison claim their innocent.
If he admitted it and plead guilty, that's it.
What do you think about Holder dismissing the Federal case against the 3 Black Panthers that was charged?
with interference and intimidation of voters in a Federal election. They were caught on camera with a baton in hand. Holder said the case was insufficient for charges. Do you think if the three had been of another ethnic group he would have prosecuted to the full extend of the law? Would you call this racism or trying to save face with the black race in order to secure votes?What do you think about Holder dismissing the Federal case against the 3 Black Panthers that was charged?
The case was brought and charges filed by the Deputy Attorney General in Pa. It was a slam dunk for violation of F.E.C. laws and a violation of the Constitutional Rights of the voters that were intimidated into not voting. If it would have been white men stopping Obama voters they would have been serving life terms by now. America is just not getting what is happening right before their eyes.What do you think about Holder dismissing the Federal case against the 3 Black Panthers that was charged?
Go ahead and be an ignorant uninformed fool then.
It will lose people like you even MORE elections.
Many of you like ';aj'; obviously know nothing about that Black Panthers.
I recommend you educate yourselves.
Only FAUX ';news'; characterized the Panther guards as ';intimidation';.
Standing guard is not against the law.
In 2000, cheating, blocking the recount physically and purging the rolls of ';black sounding'; names IS against the law.
Holder is another despicable racist from the Obama regime. We can only hope that Holder, along with Obama, never finish their terms and are removed by court orders. Holder is just another Marxist lackey holding Obama's ding-dong while the holding is available. blackness is not the issue. Marxism is the issue.
If there had been evidence that supported the charges, they would not have been dropped. The matter had nothing to do with race or ethnicity.
I want to see an explanation of the Justice Dept decision. I haven't seen much on it. It seemed a pretty straightforward case.
He's racist too. Probably an admirer of Black Panthers
Race based argument
I worry more about your English. 3 Black panthers that WERE charged, not WAS charged.
Black Panthers are the equivelent to the white KKK....
Can you not think about race? Why couldn't you just ask the question leaving out your silly comments?
Wasn't he also standing in back of Janet Reno when WACO went down,,,and the CUBAN KID sent back to CUBA.
typical
whitey helps his own, as do da blacks.
it was bullsh--.
This was wrong on all accounts. Why were they given a free pass for this? I think this is clearly a case of racism!!facial treatment
The case was brought and charges filed by the Deputy Attorney General in Pa. It was a slam dunk for violation of F.E.C. laws and a violation of the Constitutional Rights of the voters that were intimidated into not voting. If it would have been white men stopping Obama voters they would have been serving life terms by now. America is just not getting what is happening right before their eyes.What do you think about Holder dismissing the Federal case against the 3 Black Panthers that was charged?
Go ahead and be an ignorant uninformed fool then.
It will lose people like you even MORE elections.
Report Abuse
Many of you like ';aj'; obviously know nothing about that Black Panthers.
I recommend you educate yourselves.
Only FAUX ';news'; characterized the Panther guards as ';intimidation';.
Standing guard is not against the law.
In 2000, cheating, blocking the recount physically and purging the rolls of ';black sounding'; names IS against the law.
Holder is another despicable racist from the Obama regime. We can only hope that Holder, along with Obama, never finish their terms and are removed by court orders. Holder is just another Marxist lackey holding Obama's ding-dong while the holding is available. blackness is not the issue. Marxism is the issue.
If there had been evidence that supported the charges, they would not have been dropped. The matter had nothing to do with race or ethnicity.
I want to see an explanation of the Justice Dept decision. I haven't seen much on it. It seemed a pretty straightforward case.
He's racist too. Probably an admirer of Black Panthers
Race based argument
I worry more about your English. 3 Black panthers that WERE charged, not WAS charged.
Black Panthers are the equivelent to the white KKK....
Can you not think about race? Why couldn't you just ask the question leaving out your silly comments?
Wasn't he also standing in back of Janet Reno when WACO went down,,,and the CUBAN KID sent back to CUBA.
typical
whitey helps his own, as do da blacks.
it was bullsh--.
This was wrong on all accounts. Why were they given a free pass for this? I think this is clearly a case of racism!!
Where did theodore kaczynski stand trial? was it federal or state? the case number?
I keep looking for this infor but I can't find itWhere did theodore kaczynski stand trial? was it federal or state? the case number?
Sacramento California http://web.archive.org/web/2005011410170鈥?/a>Where did theodore kaczynski stand trial? was it federal or state? the case number?
The US attorneys office swore in blood they would never plea bargain with Ted and would convict him and he would get the death penalty.
Problem was that all their evidence was circumstantial and there were no eyewitnesses to any of his crimes. True, they had bundles of evidence of his bomb making but just because you build bombs in the middle of nowhere is not proof you set one off 2,000 miles away.
Still, the Government pushed on with the death penalty trial. The day jury selection was to begin it became known to the press that the Government had found a second cabin-known as Ted's secret cabin-far away from his shack in Lincoln.
Ted's defense attorneys ask for and were given a mistrial since the Government had withheld evidence and they were given no chance for a discovery hearing.
With little choice left they accepted Ted's Guilty plea and he was given life in prison without parole.
He in now incarcerated at the SuperMax prison outside Bolder Colorado.
He receives an enormous amount of mail each week-only Charles Manson is sent more.
s_e_s
Sacramento California http://web.archive.org/web/2005011410170鈥?/a>Where did theodore kaczynski stand trial? was it federal or state? the case number?
The US attorneys office swore in blood they would never plea bargain with Ted and would convict him and he would get the death penalty.
Problem was that all their evidence was circumstantial and there were no eyewitnesses to any of his crimes. True, they had bundles of evidence of his bomb making but just because you build bombs in the middle of nowhere is not proof you set one off 2,000 miles away.
Still, the Government pushed on with the death penalty trial. The day jury selection was to begin it became known to the press that the Government had found a second cabin-known as Ted's secret cabin-far away from his shack in Lincoln.
Ted's defense attorneys ask for and were given a mistrial since the Government had withheld evidence and they were given no chance for a discovery hearing.
With little choice left they accepted Ted's Guilty plea and he was given life in prison without parole.
He in now incarcerated at the SuperMax prison outside Bolder Colorado.
He receives an enormous amount of mail each week-only Charles Manson is sent more.
s_e_s
I HAVE TO WARRANTS FOR ARREST FEDERAL CASE CREDIT CARD FRAUDE I MOVED HOY MUCH WILL THEY LOOK FOR ME?
THE CHARGES ARE FOR 13 THOUSAND DOLLARS ON ILEGAL TRANSACTIONS WITH CREDIT CARDS I MOVED TO ANOTHER STATE BUT THEY ALREADY WENT TO MY PREVIOUS ADDRESS LOOKING FOR ME DO YOU THINK THEY JUST WAIT TO GET ME ON SOMETHING OR KEEP SEARCHING UNTIL THEY FIND ME????I HAVE TO WARRANTS FOR ARREST FEDERAL CASE CREDIT CARD FRAUDE I MOVED HOY MUCH WILL THEY LOOK FOR ME?
They might give up the active search in a week or so but there is a bench warrant out for your arrest which means that any cop who runs your name will see this and place you under arrest.
Everyone leaves a paper trail, you'll be found eventually. It is in your interest to contact the prosecutor and work out a plea. Good luck.I HAVE TO WARRANTS FOR ARREST FEDERAL CASE CREDIT CARD FRAUDE I MOVED HOY MUCH WILL THEY LOOK FOR ME?
You have a warrant for your arrest. Arrest warrants never go away. They will eventually catch up with you.
the feds/marshalls never stop...just ask my brother hahah
they always get their man seriously!! dude your screwed....turn yourself in, they may give you a lil brake at sentancing
they will find you, its not hard to look up your new address and have the proper authorities arrest you in the different state and take you back to where the warrant was made. all they have to do is look you up in the MVD records and they will have your new information its not going to take them long at all.
They'll keep looking. And, if it's a federal warrant, all the local law enforcement agencies will have it too. And, by now you probably have many other charges against your for fleeing and evading too. You can run, but you can't hide.
How much will they look? Seven. There is no recognized scale for how hard someone looks and no one can predict the work load of the Marshall's office.
They might give up the active search in a week or so but there is a bench warrant out for your arrest which means that any cop who runs your name will see this and place you under arrest.
Everyone leaves a paper trail, you'll be found eventually. It is in your interest to contact the prosecutor and work out a plea. Good luck.I HAVE TO WARRANTS FOR ARREST FEDERAL CASE CREDIT CARD FRAUDE I MOVED HOY MUCH WILL THEY LOOK FOR ME?
You have a warrant for your arrest. Arrest warrants never go away. They will eventually catch up with you.
the feds/marshalls never stop...just ask my brother hahah
they always get their man seriously!! dude your screwed....turn yourself in, they may give you a lil brake at sentancing
they will find you, its not hard to look up your new address and have the proper authorities arrest you in the different state and take you back to where the warrant was made. all they have to do is look you up in the MVD records and they will have your new information its not going to take them long at all.
They'll keep looking. And, if it's a federal warrant, all the local law enforcement agencies will have it too. And, by now you probably have many other charges against your for fleeing and evading too. You can run, but you can't hide.
How much will they look? Seven. There is no recognized scale for how hard someone looks and no one can predict the work load of the Marshall's office.
An alleged case of sexual harassment can be considered a federal offense, why?
Please respond if you know the answer to this question.An alleged case of sexual harassment can be considered a federal offense, why?
Because it violates one's rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness on the basis of gender or sexual discrimination. In other words, it violates your constitutionally guaranteed rights.
See Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 for more information about federal laws applying to sexual harassment in the work place, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 to the Civil Rights Act act for information on the federal laws applying to sexual harassment in public schools.An alleged case of sexual harassment can be considered a federal offense, why?
It can only be considered a federal offense if you and the accuser live in different states, or countries.
No, because if the sexual harassment is only ';alleged';, then it has not been proven. Also, sexual harassement laws are passed on the state level, not a Federal level.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QOspidd7鈥?/a>
Because it violates one's rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness on the basis of gender or sexual discrimination. In other words, it violates your constitutionally guaranteed rights.
See Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 for more information about federal laws applying to sexual harassment in the work place, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 to the Civil Rights Act act for information on the federal laws applying to sexual harassment in public schools.An alleged case of sexual harassment can be considered a federal offense, why?
It can only be considered a federal offense if you and the accuser live in different states, or countries.
No, because if the sexual harassment is only ';alleged';, then it has not been proven. Also, sexual harassement laws are passed on the state level, not a Federal level.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QOspidd7鈥?/a>
Was the President correct to make a 'Federal case' (so to speak) out of a local case from Harvard Square?
I think it was wrong for Pres. Obama to comment on anything related to an unresolved criminal case.
Rest assured that if anyone (of any race) was ';out of control'; to such a degree that he caused a disturbance in any neighborhood, then it logically follows that he also ';lost control'; with law enforcement person, particularly since he knew he could depend on his buddy Barry to make a federal case out of it...just as it happened on Prime Time last night !!! IMHO the professor staged this whole thing for publicity and to cash in on his new-found celebrity status, write a book, talk show circuit...etc, etc, etc.Was the President correct to make a 'Federal case' (so to speak) out of a local case from Harvard Square?
I was very disappointed in the President. We listened to him to find out all we could about his universal health care program. Actually we found out very little. He talked about certain numbers of people who are not covered and I believe that those numbers included illegals. I do not want our government (us )picking up the tab for illegal residents.
Also, i believe that question about the Harvard Professor was staged. This particular TV appearance by the President was too important for him to play ';Politics as Usual';. Too bad he forgot his campaign promises and is just giving us more of the same. Also, the President of the United States should be a unifier, not a racial divider. He is so far , disappointing me.Was the President correct to make a 'Federal case' (so to speak) out of a local case from Harvard Square?
I don't think he did. In fact, I don't think there is any case at all. Seems Gates was released immediate and the charges dropped. The cop over reacted. Gates probably did too. BUT cops see this sort of indignation all the time... I would have expected him to handle it a bit better once it was clear that Gates was in fact the homeowner.
He didn't make it a ';federal case';. It is still a local case.
I was the professor's house. He DID show ID. Cops can be jerks.
I don't think he made a federal case. He was asked what he thought...and he gave his opinion.
He was ask the question. If he had not answered the question then you would be criticizing him for that.*
Rest assured that if anyone (of any race) was ';out of control'; to such a degree that he caused a disturbance in any neighborhood, then it logically follows that he also ';lost control'; with law enforcement person, particularly since he knew he could depend on his buddy Barry to make a federal case out of it...just as it happened on Prime Time last night !!! IMHO the professor staged this whole thing for publicity and to cash in on his new-found celebrity status, write a book, talk show circuit...etc, etc, etc.Was the President correct to make a 'Federal case' (so to speak) out of a local case from Harvard Square?
I was very disappointed in the President. We listened to him to find out all we could about his universal health care program. Actually we found out very little. He talked about certain numbers of people who are not covered and I believe that those numbers included illegals. I do not want our government (us )picking up the tab for illegal residents.
Also, i believe that question about the Harvard Professor was staged. This particular TV appearance by the President was too important for him to play ';Politics as Usual';. Too bad he forgot his campaign promises and is just giving us more of the same. Also, the President of the United States should be a unifier, not a racial divider. He is so far , disappointing me.Was the President correct to make a 'Federal case' (so to speak) out of a local case from Harvard Square?
I don't think he did. In fact, I don't think there is any case at all. Seems Gates was released immediate and the charges dropped. The cop over reacted. Gates probably did too. BUT cops see this sort of indignation all the time... I would have expected him to handle it a bit better once it was clear that Gates was in fact the homeowner.
He didn't make it a ';federal case';. It is still a local case.
I was the professor's house. He DID show ID. Cops can be jerks.
I don't think he made a federal case. He was asked what he thought...and he gave his opinion.
He was ask the question. If he had not answered the question then you would be criticizing him for that.*
How do i search for a federal court case?
http://www.archives.gov/judicial/ FindLaw is also a good site.
I am involving a federal criminal case. Where can I search for similiar case?
I was accused for federal criminal case of smaggling cigarette to other states. According to the guide line. I will be punished for 5 years in the jail. However, my lawyer charged me 25,000 retainer fee and not did anything at all. I went to the court for 5 times. DA always said she didn't have enough time to read the file and postpond the court date again and again. After one year waiting, I finally got a peal bargain from the DA, which was instead of 5 years jail time, she gave me 4 years. I talked to my lawyer that this was not the peal bargain deal at all and asked him to re-bargain. He said this is the deal only that we couldn't bargain again and push me go for trial which cost 80,000 that he wanted me to pay upfront. I couldn't affort it. Therefore, I changed another chinese lawyer who is charging me less money.How can I make them speed up my case? Also,can Judge pay more attention for my case?How can I prove to DA or Judge that I am innoence?where can I search for similiar case?I am involving a federal criminal case. Where can I search for similiar case?
Habeaus Corpus is one option, but it's only really intended as a collateral attack on wrongful imprisonment.
As to proving you are innocent, that's the trial process. The judge just grants or denies continuances (delays) based on what the attorneys (prosecutor and defense) ask for. The judge cannot pay more attention to the matter, unless one of the attorney's brings a motion before the court.
Ask your new attorney about a Speedy Trial motion.I am involving a federal criminal case. Where can I search for similiar case?
You can file what is called a ';Writ of Habius Corpus'; (not sure of the spelling) which forces them to either try you, or dismiss the charges. It falls under your constitutional rights to a speedy trial. They usually put trials off because they lack evidence against you, and are using this to buy time to trump up evidence to convict you with. Your attorney is a rip off, and is not trying to defend you. If you got any sense, you will refuse the plea bargain and demand to be tried right away. Make them prove it!!! A good attorney would have this thrown out of court or would have suggested what I have suggested. I would call him on this, and demand your money back, because ALL attorneys know about this, and he intentionally withheld this information from you. I think you need to bring a suit against your attorney for misrepresentation and fraud. You may be able to get information and some help from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. They train people to be attorneys, and sometimes will take cases to use for their training. If you send them a long letter and explain how you have been treated, you might get a lot of help with your case for free. I might also suggest; you have a word with your state bar association concerning your attorney, and his lack of effort in your case.
Now I found out what it is: You need to file a motion for a speedy trial in the form of a ';Writ of a Habeaus Corpus';.
Habeaus Corpus is one option, but it's only really intended as a collateral attack on wrongful imprisonment.
As to proving you are innocent, that's the trial process. The judge just grants or denies continuances (delays) based on what the attorneys (prosecutor and defense) ask for. The judge cannot pay more attention to the matter, unless one of the attorney's brings a motion before the court.
Ask your new attorney about a Speedy Trial motion.facial treatment
Habeaus Corpus is one option, but it's only really intended as a collateral attack on wrongful imprisonment.
As to proving you are innocent, that's the trial process. The judge just grants or denies continuances (delays) based on what the attorneys (prosecutor and defense) ask for. The judge cannot pay more attention to the matter, unless one of the attorney's brings a motion before the court.
Ask your new attorney about a Speedy Trial motion.I am involving a federal criminal case. Where can I search for similiar case?
You can file what is called a ';Writ of Habius Corpus'; (not sure of the spelling) which forces them to either try you, or dismiss the charges. It falls under your constitutional rights to a speedy trial. They usually put trials off because they lack evidence against you, and are using this to buy time to trump up evidence to convict you with. Your attorney is a rip off, and is not trying to defend you. If you got any sense, you will refuse the plea bargain and demand to be tried right away. Make them prove it!!! A good attorney would have this thrown out of court or would have suggested what I have suggested. I would call him on this, and demand your money back, because ALL attorneys know about this, and he intentionally withheld this information from you. I think you need to bring a suit against your attorney for misrepresentation and fraud. You may be able to get information and some help from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. They train people to be attorneys, and sometimes will take cases to use for their training. If you send them a long letter and explain how you have been treated, you might get a lot of help with your case for free. I might also suggest; you have a word with your state bar association concerning your attorney, and his lack of effort in your case.
Now I found out what it is: You need to file a motion for a speedy trial in the form of a ';Writ of a Habeaus Corpus';.
Habeaus Corpus is one option, but it's only really intended as a collateral attack on wrongful imprisonment.
As to proving you are innocent, that's the trial process. The judge just grants or denies continuances (delays) based on what the attorneys (prosecutor and defense) ask for. The judge cannot pay more attention to the matter, unless one of the attorney's brings a motion before the court.
Ask your new attorney about a Speedy Trial motion.
I have a case that they are going after me in the civil federal court for fraud can they after if they win go?
are you asking ';can i get sued again after i win in court?';
if it is, the answer is no because of double jeopardy. you cannot be taken to court for the same charge twice. if not, tough luck.I have a case that they are going after me in the civil federal court for fraud can they after if they win go?
Do you realize your question is incoherent? If someone is suing you, get a lawyer.I have a case that they are going after me in the civil federal court for fraud can they after if they win go?
If you talk to them like you posed this question, good luck in prison.
English clear you need to write in do or after they win you will go
if it is, the answer is no because of double jeopardy. you cannot be taken to court for the same charge twice. if not, tough luck.I have a case that they are going after me in the civil federal court for fraud can they after if they win go?
Do you realize your question is incoherent? If someone is suing you, get a lawyer.I have a case that they are going after me in the civil federal court for fraud can they after if they win go?
If you talk to them like you posed this question, good luck in prison.
English clear you need to write in do or after they win you will go
Is this a State Case or Federal Case?
NEW YORK – A Brooklyn woman filed a multimillion dollar lawsuit against the Daily News on Tuesday seeking damages in the aftermath of the paper’s Scratch n’ Match fiasco.
Linette Stewart, 35, said she was led to believe she won three $100,000 cash prizes after completing the contest form in Saturday’s paper.
Sunday, the newspaper informed its readers of a misprint by an outside contractor that led many people to believe they had won.
“Our dreams were shattered,” said Stewart a paralegal, “And it’s not fair.” She filed her lawsuit in Queens Supreme Court on Tuesday. It was the second lawsuit over the contest in as many days.
Monday, about 2,000 irate readers waited in line outside the paper’s prize-validation office. The Daily News put blame on the contest administrator for allowing “typographical errors”. The paper announced that all supposed winning tickets will be place into a new drawing with a higher cash prize.Is this a State Case or Federal Case?
State. But it's also not a crime. A crime must have intent. It's just a lawsuit, and I don't think she'll win.Is this a State Case or Federal Case?
State. Federal would only be involved if it involved fraud, this sounds like just a mistake.
This is a Civil case and they are tried in State District Court.
Neither. It's a civil law suit, and she doesn't stand a chance of winning.
Linette Stewart, 35, said she was led to believe she won three $100,000 cash prizes after completing the contest form in Saturday’s paper.
Sunday, the newspaper informed its readers of a misprint by an outside contractor that led many people to believe they had won.
“Our dreams were shattered,” said Stewart a paralegal, “And it’s not fair.” She filed her lawsuit in Queens Supreme Court on Tuesday. It was the second lawsuit over the contest in as many days.
Monday, about 2,000 irate readers waited in line outside the paper’s prize-validation office. The Daily News put blame on the contest administrator for allowing “typographical errors”. The paper announced that all supposed winning tickets will be place into a new drawing with a higher cash prize.Is this a State Case or Federal Case?
State. But it's also not a crime. A crime must have intent. It's just a lawsuit, and I don't think she'll win.Is this a State Case or Federal Case?
State. Federal would only be involved if it involved fraud, this sounds like just a mistake.
This is a Civil case and they are tried in State District Court.
Neither. It's a civil law suit, and she doesn't stand a chance of winning.
Should a criminal be entitled to a federal grand jury when charged in a state case? after having a preliminary
A federal grand jury has no authority to inquire into a state crime.Should a criminal be entitled to a federal grand jury when charged in a state case? after having a preliminary
No, the federal and state judicial systems are completely separate. The only way for a criminal to end up in front of a federal grand jury after a preliminary appearance in state court is:
1) The offense committed is a violation of both federal and state law and the person is being charged under both (state may or may not drop their case upon a conviction at the federal level); or
2) The criminal has been subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury in another matter.
Should a criminal be entitled to a federal grand jury when charged in a state case? after having a preliminary
Only if the DA prefers the case go before the Grand Jury. It is not a individuals call.
No, the federal and state judicial systems are completely separate. The only way for a criminal to end up in front of a federal grand jury after a preliminary appearance in state court is:
1) The offense committed is a violation of both federal and state law and the person is being charged under both (state may or may not drop their case upon a conviction at the federal level); or
2) The criminal has been subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury in another matter.
Should a criminal be entitled to a federal grand jury when charged in a state case? after having a preliminary
Only if the DA prefers the case go before the Grand Jury. It is not a individuals call.
I'm involved in an unjust CPS case. I want to complain to the proper state and/or federal officials. WHO?
Who are the proper officials to place a complaint with? CPS has proceeded with a few not safe and radical decissions. I'd like to have my case reviewed by the proper authority. I need my case safer. I expect it to be reviewed and delt with properly and justly. As of now, my children and myself are not safe or together due to bad decision making by my social worker. Who is the proper authority to contact?I'm involved in an unjust CPS case. I want to complain to the proper state and/or federal officials. WHO?
Search online for the CPS in your area. They will have a complaint or ombudsmean contact.I'm involved in an unjust CPS case. I want to complain to the proper state and/or federal officials. WHO?
Contacting your Ombudsman, or even CPS in your area has already proved a dead end. If you do some research, you will learn that the money received from the ';detention'; (or stealing really) of a child from their ';family'; (not just the parents) is an extremely lucrative Corporation 4 the gov.
Search online for the CPS in your area. They will have a complaint or ombudsmean contact.I'm involved in an unjust CPS case. I want to complain to the proper state and/or federal officials. WHO?
Contacting your Ombudsman, or even CPS in your area has already proved a dead end. If you do some research, you will learn that the money received from the ';detention'; (or stealing really) of a child from their ';family'; (not just the parents) is an extremely lucrative Corporation 4 the gov.
Report Abuse
Federal Bankruptcy Court: How do I protect my rights vs. the trustee in a bankruptcy case?
The trustee was able to get a default judgment against me as a creditor in a ponzi scheme. This was done without my knowledge in that several notices were never received. Further, I had used the trustee's lawfirm in the past and knew the attorney handling the matter, so everything was apparently casual. Now I am faced with having to vacate the default. I also need to defend my position that I any funds paid to me were in the ordinary course, and try to establish the actual accounting of the matter. This all happened 8 or so years ago, and many records are no longer in existence. Upon learning of the judgment several weeks ago, I have been very indignant and have threatened attorney ethics charges vs. the trustee's firm. The Court appears to just want this over. How do I present myself as a victim of the trustee, and not as a johnny come lately desperately defending myself?Federal Bankruptcy Court: How do I protect my rights vs. the trustee in a bankruptcy case?
boy---nows the time to have a ';good'; attorney on your side. i feel for you buddy.Federal Bankruptcy Court: How do I protect my rights vs. the trustee in a bankruptcy case?
Get a good smart a$$ lawyer :D
ugh you're boned dude.
boy---nows the time to have a ';good'; attorney on your side. i feel for you buddy.Federal Bankruptcy Court: How do I protect my rights vs. the trustee in a bankruptcy case?
Get a good smart a$$ lawyer :D
ugh you're boned dude.
Are we free when Federal Court refuses to hear case about illegal Government Activities?
no...we're in what I call ';dissolving democracy'; we believe that we have our freedom but it's slowly being taken away from us without us realizing it....and what the government is saying to us to not have an outcry and be publicly outrage....';it's the war on terror';, ';we have to take these precautions for the terrorist';.....it's only a matter of time before it's completely gone....court cases, president tapping phones, etc. it's all little steps to a big picture which we wont realize until it's already done....Are we free when Federal Court refuses to hear case about illegal Government Activities?
What case and why was it denied? And yes, I still feel ';free';!Are we free when Federal Court refuses to hear case about illegal Government Activities?
we are not free, WE ARE LICENSED
you are free if and when they ever decide to file charges on you again
How can you be free when the ';leader'; and ';decider'; can pull you off the street and detain you forever? The Shah had absolute power and look how he turned out!.
we are not free period
Not sure! Real freedom is lost if we throw away the laws governing us.facial treatment
What case and why was it denied? And yes, I still feel ';free';!Are we free when Federal Court refuses to hear case about illegal Government Activities?
we are not free, WE ARE LICENSED
you are free if and when they ever decide to file charges on you again
How can you be free when the ';leader'; and ';decider'; can pull you off the street and detain you forever? The Shah had absolute power and look how he turned out!.
we are not free period
Not sure! Real freedom is lost if we throw away the laws governing us.
How do i look up federal inmate case information?
You could try here:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pubalp2.htm
Good Luck! *hugs* ~ :)How do i look up federal inmate case information?
You can only look up detailed case information if you work in the justice system. If you want a criminal background check you need their permission.How do i look up federal inmate case information?
If you are looking for info on a specific person, you can go to the states inmate website and look up through ';offender search.'; For example, florida has a website ';florida dept of corrections'; which I can access. Also, if you know the the county where an individual is charged, access their webpage and look up public records free of charge.
go to www.michigancorrections.gov that will get you started then it will tell you to type in there name and the year they started to be an inmate
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pubalp2.htm
Good Luck! *hugs* ~ :)How do i look up federal inmate case information?
You can only look up detailed case information if you work in the justice system. If you want a criminal background check you need their permission.How do i look up federal inmate case information?
If you are looking for info on a specific person, you can go to the states inmate website and look up through ';offender search.'; For example, florida has a website ';florida dept of corrections'; which I can access. Also, if you know the the county where an individual is charged, access their webpage and look up public records free of charge.
go to www.michigancorrections.gov that will get you started then it will tell you to type in there name and the year they started to be an inmate
Can either Democrats or Republicans make a genuine case that they seek to balance the federal budget?
Look to the libertarians.Can either Democrats or Republicans make a genuine case that they seek to balance the federal budget?
Both are very wasteful. They are just wasteful on different things.
Remember when you vote this fall. It's Congress that actually controls the budget. Not the President. Congress can do a cut and paste on the budget. The President only gets to submit a wish list and sign or veto the ENTIRE budget. And the President is very reluctant to veto beacuse the budget is usually late when it arrives to be signed. To veto could mean many problems.Can either Democrats or Republicans make a genuine case that they seek to balance the federal budget?
I can make a case that having a balanced budget can be bad.
Shortly after the Gulf War in 1991, ';The Peace Dividend'; became a buzz-phrase that came up frequently during the annual budget battle inside the beltway, and it lasted for several consecutive years as I recall. Then, in the mid/late '90s, ';The Peace Dividend'; joined forces with an economic-boom-driven surge in tax receipts to create a budget surplus. What a bonanza, we all thought. Well, almost all of us, anyway . . .
A tiny minority of iconoclasts had one eyebrow raised, and one skeptical eye focused on the precipitous decline in national security's share of the spending mix. Their nagging questions: Was it wise to invest ';The Peace Dividend'; in everything except enhancing future peace prospects? Would objectors be audible in the midst of the mardi-gras-style celebration of Surplus-mania and ';fiscal discipline';? Answers: No, and No.
Fast forward five years. Our 1990's decision to reduce national security spending, i.e., our decision not to invest ';The Peace Dividend'; in enhancing future peace prospects, was a huge factor in the creation of the falsely-revered surplus. (Falsely-revered because it made only a small dent in our ho-hum debt burden.)
Would the Pentagon, Foggy Bottom, and Langley have used a reinvested Peace Dividend to successfully counter the asymmetric threats which subsequently destroyed embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killed seventeen servicemen on the USS Cole, or murdered thousands on 9-11-01? Maybe, maybe not; I'd like to think so, because I'm an optimist. But we'll never know.
What we do know is this: ';The Peace Dividend'; was not invested in the enhancement of future peace prospects; instead, it was invested in creating a political gold mine: ';The Surplus';鈥攚hich, in my opinion, would be more aptly named ';The National Security Disinvestment.';
I certainly hope we don't forget this lesson; if we do, we'll just have to relearn it the hard way sometime down the road.
The last president to balance the budget was a Democrat, Clinton. And a big reason he was successful in doing that was the 'paygo' system. Something the Bush administration eliminated almost immediately after taking office. Obama is talking about adopting a very similar system to paygo.
To educate a few, there was NO BUDGET SURPLUS during the Clinton administration. There was a ';projected'; surplus, but they found a way to spend it before it became real.
Somehow the media supressed that little fact. Gosh, the media never supresses info does it? ;-)
But to answer your question, neither has any intention of balancing the budget.
Getting rid of ridiculous governmental spending is the first step. I vote for the Dept of Education and Energy to be removed.
Removing revenues which is a side effect of raising taxes will not help anyone. Reduces money in your pocket and promotes sheltering of money - go read about the Laffer Curve.
Funny how the liberals have such a hard time understanding HOUSEHOLD incomes of over 250k is the target of Obama's taxes. But that is a lot more people that you realize once he tries to remove the Bush tax cuts.
Clinton left office with budget surpluses. One start to achieving a balanced budget is to follow Obama's tax plan for individuals with incomes over $250,000 and then concentrate on getting the economy back on track by doing the opposite of Bush neocon supply-side economics.
No they can not both are into spending more then they make. One just wants to raise taxes so income decreases.
Not unless they do away with entitlements.
Mac Cain wants to and Obama wants to tax more and give more stuff away. Peace
no.
Can't they just print more money?
Both are very wasteful. They are just wasteful on different things.
Remember when you vote this fall. It's Congress that actually controls the budget. Not the President. Congress can do a cut and paste on the budget. The President only gets to submit a wish list and sign or veto the ENTIRE budget. And the President is very reluctant to veto beacuse the budget is usually late when it arrives to be signed. To veto could mean many problems.Can either Democrats or Republicans make a genuine case that they seek to balance the federal budget?
I can make a case that having a balanced budget can be bad.
Shortly after the Gulf War in 1991, ';The Peace Dividend'; became a buzz-phrase that came up frequently during the annual budget battle inside the beltway, and it lasted for several consecutive years as I recall. Then, in the mid/late '90s, ';The Peace Dividend'; joined forces with an economic-boom-driven surge in tax receipts to create a budget surplus. What a bonanza, we all thought. Well, almost all of us, anyway . . .
A tiny minority of iconoclasts had one eyebrow raised, and one skeptical eye focused on the precipitous decline in national security's share of the spending mix. Their nagging questions: Was it wise to invest ';The Peace Dividend'; in everything except enhancing future peace prospects? Would objectors be audible in the midst of the mardi-gras-style celebration of Surplus-mania and ';fiscal discipline';? Answers: No, and No.
Fast forward five years. Our 1990's decision to reduce national security spending, i.e., our decision not to invest ';The Peace Dividend'; in enhancing future peace prospects, was a huge factor in the creation of the falsely-revered surplus. (Falsely-revered because it made only a small dent in our ho-hum debt burden.)
Would the Pentagon, Foggy Bottom, and Langley have used a reinvested Peace Dividend to successfully counter the asymmetric threats which subsequently destroyed embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killed seventeen servicemen on the USS Cole, or murdered thousands on 9-11-01? Maybe, maybe not; I'd like to think so, because I'm an optimist. But we'll never know.
What we do know is this: ';The Peace Dividend'; was not invested in the enhancement of future peace prospects; instead, it was invested in creating a political gold mine: ';The Surplus';鈥攚hich, in my opinion, would be more aptly named ';The National Security Disinvestment.';
I certainly hope we don't forget this lesson; if we do, we'll just have to relearn it the hard way sometime down the road.
The last president to balance the budget was a Democrat, Clinton. And a big reason he was successful in doing that was the 'paygo' system. Something the Bush administration eliminated almost immediately after taking office. Obama is talking about adopting a very similar system to paygo.
To educate a few, there was NO BUDGET SURPLUS during the Clinton administration. There was a ';projected'; surplus, but they found a way to spend it before it became real.
Somehow the media supressed that little fact. Gosh, the media never supresses info does it? ;-)
But to answer your question, neither has any intention of balancing the budget.
Getting rid of ridiculous governmental spending is the first step. I vote for the Dept of Education and Energy to be removed.
Removing revenues which is a side effect of raising taxes will not help anyone. Reduces money in your pocket and promotes sheltering of money - go read about the Laffer Curve.
Funny how the liberals have such a hard time understanding HOUSEHOLD incomes of over 250k is the target of Obama's taxes. But that is a lot more people that you realize once he tries to remove the Bush tax cuts.
Clinton left office with budget surpluses. One start to achieving a balanced budget is to follow Obama's tax plan for individuals with incomes over $250,000 and then concentrate on getting the economy back on track by doing the opposite of Bush neocon supply-side economics.
No they can not both are into spending more then they make. One just wants to raise taxes so income decreases.
Not unless they do away with entitlements.
Mac Cain wants to and Obama wants to tax more and give more stuff away. Peace
no.
Can't they just print more money?
FEDERAL CASE 07-2760207?
need access to courts filesFEDERAL CASE 07-2760207?
Try this link. Public Access to Court Electronic Records it might help you.
http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/pacerdesc.鈥?/a>
Try this link. Public Access to Court Electronic Records it might help you.
http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/pacerdesc.鈥?/a>
Federal case woodal vs bop?
Can you offer additional information? I couldn't find a reference to this case with what you have supplied.
If I am involved in a federal court case, how much court fees can I be expecting if the case goes 6 mo-1yr?
my divorce lasted two years, at $300 an hour my total bill was around $22000.00facial treatment
Should The Australian Federal Police be reprimanded over the Haneef case?
Yes. And regards the Australian Government! Their policy towards the Native PEOPLE of Australia, F.....g damnable.. Which is surprising considering their Lineage, The Dregs of English Prisons.. God Bless the ANZACS, and AUSTRALIA...Should The Australian Federal Police be reprimanded over the Haneef case?
No!
No!
Was the case Loving v.s. Virginia a state or federal case?
Federal.
Little tip - any time that you see the state name in the case instead of ';Commonwealth v. Doe'; or ';State v. Doe';, it's a federal case, otherwise the state would just use the shorthand above.
Little tip - any time that you see the state name in the case instead of ';Commonwealth v. Doe'; or ';State v. Doe';, it's a federal case, otherwise the state would just use the shorthand above.
How do I get a docket number and a copy of a case filed in federal court?
You might get the docket number on this site:
http://www.justia.com/
Unless it is a famous case which is online, contact the federal court for info where the case can be viewed.How do I get a docket number and a copy of a case filed in federal court?
Depending on the court, you may find the information on the court's website. Each court is in one or more state-limited district (except for the DC district Court and a few specialized courts). If you enter ';US District Court MA'; for example, you will find the specific court.
Or call the clerk's office. Some courts still use a telephonic information system that may give you the docket number.
Most documents have to be obtained in person or by mail, since there is a fee for copies.
If you know a lawyer who has access to the court's information system, s/he can get the docket number and copies of documents for a small charge.How do I get a docket number and a copy of a case filed in federal court?
if its a current case. go to the court website (www.uscourts.gov lists all) and sign up for pacer-requires a CC, but only cost .08 per page.
Can search by either party, attorney names, date of filing, etc will provide docket number and links to the all filed documents.
Court documents are public records, even federal ones. Go to the court and ask if you can get copies of the records, if you don't know the docket number the court can find it for you but you have to know the names of the parties.
Good Luck
Hi.you could try http://background-report.com/
If it is on yourself, you can ask for a copy of such case from the attorney who handled it.
http://www.justia.com/
Unless it is a famous case which is online, contact the federal court for info where the case can be viewed.How do I get a docket number and a copy of a case filed in federal court?
Depending on the court, you may find the information on the court's website. Each court is in one or more state-limited district (except for the DC district Court and a few specialized courts). If you enter ';US District Court MA'; for example, you will find the specific court.
Or call the clerk's office. Some courts still use a telephonic information system that may give you the docket number.
Most documents have to be obtained in person or by mail, since there is a fee for copies.
If you know a lawyer who has access to the court's information system, s/he can get the docket number and copies of documents for a small charge.How do I get a docket number and a copy of a case filed in federal court?
if its a current case. go to the court website (www.uscourts.gov lists all) and sign up for pacer-requires a CC, but only cost .08 per page.
Can search by either party, attorney names, date of filing, etc will provide docket number and links to the all filed documents.
Court documents are public records, even federal ones. Go to the court and ask if you can get copies of the records, if you don't know the docket number the court can find it for you but you have to know the names of the parties.
Good Luck
Hi.you could try http://background-report.com/
If it is on yourself, you can ask for a copy of such case from the attorney who handled it.
Saturday, August 7, 2010
Does any one know a good Federal attorney who would take a case in Indiana?
I won't get into details, but my brother is is in need of a good federal attorney that does not require the whole fee up front, would let us make payments or something. Help? time is of the essence. He had a Public Defender, but the guy went on vacation at a very crucial time, and he is kind of in the wind right now, and we decided not to wait. We are in desperate need of help!Does any one know a good Federal attorney who would take a case in Indiana?
Contact your county's chapter of the Indiana Bar Association. The link below is the list of all the county's bar associations in Indiana. They will refer the best lawyer for you to fit your legal and financial situation. Remember, as the top of the page says, the Indiana Bar Association itself will not make referrals, the individual bar association for your county will. Good luck.
http://www.inbar.org/content/localbar/lo鈥?/a>Does any one know a good Federal attorney who would take a case in Indiana?
What's a federal attorney? I'm a lawyer and I've never heard of one.
If you're talking about a good lawyer who is qualified in federal court, no one but a very bad lawyer or a very new lawyer will pick up the case without a big payment in advance. People under indictment tend to get convicted, and once they do, neither they nor their family pays the lawyer anymore. Maybe you can get a second mortgage or something to pay a good lawyer.
Check on martindale.com. You can search attorneys by location and practice area. But doing so will probably cost you time, as the new attorney will move for a continuance to learn the facts of the case.
Yes! Just call on Jesus, he's the best Judge I recommend!
Gayle
Contact your county's chapter of the Indiana Bar Association. The link below is the list of all the county's bar associations in Indiana. They will refer the best lawyer for you to fit your legal and financial situation. Remember, as the top of the page says, the Indiana Bar Association itself will not make referrals, the individual bar association for your county will. Good luck.
http://www.inbar.org/content/localbar/lo鈥?/a>Does any one know a good Federal attorney who would take a case in Indiana?
What's a federal attorney? I'm a lawyer and I've never heard of one.
If you're talking about a good lawyer who is qualified in federal court, no one but a very bad lawyer or a very new lawyer will pick up the case without a big payment in advance. People under indictment tend to get convicted, and once they do, neither they nor their family pays the lawyer anymore. Maybe you can get a second mortgage or something to pay a good lawyer.
Check on martindale.com. You can search attorneys by location and practice area. But doing so will probably cost you time, as the new attorney will move for a continuance to learn the facts of the case.
Yes! Just call on Jesus, he's the best Judge I recommend!
Gayle
Federal case law?
I need to find this case citation; 549 F.2nd 97, 105
it's a 1976 case I need the case summary and findingsFederal case law?
Ramirez, Leal %26amp; Co. v. City Demonstration Agency 549 F.2nd 97 (9th Cir.1976). The plaintiffs in Ramirez were a Latino accounting firm that was overlooked in its bid to obtain a contract through a HUD-funded program, the Model Cities Program. This case did not address the issues of employment opportunities, but rather the issue of awarding contracts and subcontracts to persons in need.Federal case law?
http://w3.uchastings.edu/plri/96-97tex/h鈥?/a>
Here's the link to the case. Have fun.
Isn't that the case of Bert v. Ernie, that established that persons of the same sex or cloth can adopt children?
Or maybe it's the case of In Re The Marriage Of Ho and Beyotch, which established the principle that the wife gets 1/2 of the marital estate, and the kids get the other half, and 50% of the husband's income as alimony, and the other half in chidl support, and husband pays all of her attorney's fees, and she gets a bag of chips.
it's a 1976 case I need the case summary and findingsFederal case law?
Ramirez, Leal %26amp; Co. v. City Demonstration Agency 549 F.2nd 97 (9th Cir.1976). The plaintiffs in Ramirez were a Latino accounting firm that was overlooked in its bid to obtain a contract through a HUD-funded program, the Model Cities Program. This case did not address the issues of employment opportunities, but rather the issue of awarding contracts and subcontracts to persons in need.Federal case law?
http://w3.uchastings.edu/plri/96-97tex/h鈥?/a>
Here's the link to the case. Have fun.
Isn't that the case of Bert v. Ernie, that established that persons of the same sex or cloth can adopt children?
Or maybe it's the case of In Re The Marriage Of Ho and Beyotch, which established the principle that the wife gets 1/2 of the marital estate, and the kids get the other half, and 50% of the husband's income as alimony, and the other half in chidl support, and husband pays all of her attorney's fees, and she gets a bag of chips.
What is Prima Facie Case mean and what law covers it in Federal Court?
A Prima Facie case is a case where the facts available offer a sufficient case to demand a response from the defendant.
It's a Common Law precept - there is no legislated law to cover it.
See these links;
http://www.google.com/search?q=prima+fac鈥?/a>What is Prima Facie Case mean and what law covers it in Federal Court?
';Prima Facie'; means ';at first look.'; It means that the evidence appears to establish the claim or criminal charge in the absence of substantial contradictory evidence presented by the other party.What is Prima Facie Case mean and what law covers it in Federal Court?
Prima Facie basically means... on the face.
It's essentially saying that -- if it doesn't look like there's enough evidence to possibly prove anything... then you don't have a case.
go to this website and it will tell you everything you need to know...
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p078.htmunder eye concealer
It's a Common Law precept - there is no legislated law to cover it.
See these links;
http://www.google.com/search?q=prima+fac鈥?/a>What is Prima Facie Case mean and what law covers it in Federal Court?
';Prima Facie'; means ';at first look.'; It means that the evidence appears to establish the claim or criminal charge in the absence of substantial contradictory evidence presented by the other party.What is Prima Facie Case mean and what law covers it in Federal Court?
Prima Facie basically means... on the face.
It's essentially saying that -- if it doesn't look like there's enough evidence to possibly prove anything... then you don't have a case.
go to this website and it will tell you everything you need to know...
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p078.htm
What is a federal case?
As in ';Don't make a Federal Case out of it?
Dates back to Prohibition when gangsters were being jailed for a number of federal laws (mainly tax and postal laws) they had violated when local law enforcement was being bought off. The meaning is to take an offense somebody thinks they should be allowed to get away with and making it into something they will regret, and by implication you will regret having noticed.What is a federal case?
WHEN SOMEBODY BREAKS A FEDERAL LAW AND IT GOES TO TRIAL.What is a federal case?
Federal law has been violated . Why is there a problem? good luck.
A crime commited in violation of federal law, like racketeering, kidnapping, etc.
You can get into federal court three ways:
1. If it is a federal question.
2. If there is diversity of citizenship.
3. If the amount in question is over $250,000.00.
This is when a federal law has been violated. Some of these include interstate commerce laws as well as constitutional issues (violation of the voting act, violation of some part of the 14th amendment, etc). Most drug laws are federal (although they are usually prosecuted at the local level)
A violation of a federal law. DUHHHH!
That would mean that a Federal law, not a state, county or local law has been violated. Federal cases are generally more serious, they are tried in Federal Courts, prosecuted by Federal Attorneys and the guilty are housed in Federal Prisons.
when 2 or more laws have been violated such as armed robbery that would be a federal case if a weopen is used and anouther crime takes place
Dates back to Prohibition when gangsters were being jailed for a number of federal laws (mainly tax and postal laws) they had violated when local law enforcement was being bought off. The meaning is to take an offense somebody thinks they should be allowed to get away with and making it into something they will regret, and by implication you will regret having noticed.What is a federal case?
WHEN SOMEBODY BREAKS A FEDERAL LAW AND IT GOES TO TRIAL.What is a federal case?
Federal law has been violated . Why is there a problem? good luck.
A crime commited in violation of federal law, like racketeering, kidnapping, etc.
You can get into federal court three ways:
1. If it is a federal question.
2. If there is diversity of citizenship.
3. If the amount in question is over $250,000.00.
This is when a federal law has been violated. Some of these include interstate commerce laws as well as constitutional issues (violation of the voting act, violation of some part of the 14th amendment, etc). Most drug laws are federal (although they are usually prosecuted at the local level)
A violation of a federal law. DUHHHH!
That would mean that a Federal law, not a state, county or local law has been violated. Federal cases are generally more serious, they are tried in Federal Courts, prosecuted by Federal Attorneys and the guilty are housed in Federal Prisons.
when 2 or more laws have been violated such as armed robbery that would be a federal case if a weopen is used and anouther crime takes place
Can anyone choose whether to have their case heard in a state court or federal court?
It's based upon subject matter jurisdiction.
The Federal courts sorta has a policy of trying not to hear cases, i.e. they'll kick cases to state court at every opportunity.
There are three ways to get into Federal court. 1) If it's a federal question 2) Diversity of citizenship and it meets the amount in controversy requirement and 3) removal.Can anyone choose whether to have their case heard in a state court or federal court?
No.
If you are charged with a Federal crime, you are tried in Federal court. If you are charged with a State crime then you are tried in State court.
If you sue someone then the case is heard in State court unless it meets one of the specific tests for the Federal courts to have jurisdiction.
RichardCan anyone choose whether to have their case heard in a state court or federal court?
It depends.
Most states have bankruptcy laws, and you can do a state or a federal bankruptcy.
If it is about a state law, then it has to be state.
The Federal courts sorta has a policy of trying not to hear cases, i.e. they'll kick cases to state court at every opportunity.
There are three ways to get into Federal court. 1) If it's a federal question 2) Diversity of citizenship and it meets the amount in controversy requirement and 3) removal.Can anyone choose whether to have their case heard in a state court or federal court?
No.
If you are charged with a Federal crime, you are tried in Federal court. If you are charged with a State crime then you are tried in State court.
If you sue someone then the case is heard in State court unless it meets one of the specific tests for the Federal courts to have jurisdiction.
RichardCan anyone choose whether to have their case heard in a state court or federal court?
It depends.
Most states have bankruptcy laws, and you can do a state or a federal bankruptcy.
If it is about a state law, then it has to be state.
If someone is currently in custody on a federal charge and has a pending state case,?
do they have to take care of the federal case before they can proceed with the state case?If someone is currently in custody on a federal charge and has a pending state case,?
yes
yes
Why does he make a federal case out of everything I say???
I bring up the fact that I don't agree with something, or feel hurt by something, and he freaks out on me. Why?!? We say rude, hurtful things and never solve any of the reasons... we just eventually move on. Nothing ever gets fixed. We can't figure out how to communicate better. What am I doing wrong!?!?!Why does he make a federal case out of everything I say???
I agree with broverman77.
If you plan on keeping this fellow around, then learn to Not share every opposing opinion and little hurt feeling.
Try to resolve your own issues independently. Try to say positive things around him.
He's definitely on the defensive, here....
His reaction, however inappropriate, is true. He has no idea how to fix the complaint, and he's too young to just go, ';Ok, hon.';
So he responds with the first thing out of his mouth, which,when interpreted, means: '; I have no clue what you just said or what the problem is. I have no clue how I am supposed to fix this for you....';
So do not verbalize negatives to him. Speak only positives.
Try to deal with things you percieve as as an ';issue'; independently.
Give the guy a break. I really don't think he has a clue as what to say to you.Why does he make a federal case out of everything I say???
I definitely would not have chosen this as best answer... but I guess ya snooze, ya lose... he's too young to just go ';ok hon';? Do you even know our ages??? Also, you were completely wrong in your assumptions. Sorry, but way off.
Men don't communicate well. Once you accept that, life gets better.
We like to eat, sleep and fornicate. Not much else, really. The rest we do to meet one of the aforementioned objectives. Any man that tells you otherwise is either 1) lying or 2) delusional.
The thing you are doing wrong is waisting your time with the wrong person. It takes two to make a relationship work. And the word work is key. Relationships take a lot of work and a little bit of love each day. He is not willing and it hurting you. It is about control and he's got it. Move on, I know it hurts but you will be happier for it later with the right man.
Sounds like you are talking at each other instead of to each other. If you say rude and hurtful things to each other, why are you getting married, do you think it will get better? Maybe he has something else on his mind.
Opening your mouth.Try keeping your yap shut for once.And my ole lady just smacked me for that one!!
I would consider reading ';The Proper Care and Feeding of Marriage'; and ';The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands.';
I think both of you need to grow up and stop the fighting. The reasons why things don't get fixed is because you two can't be mature adults to work them. So, stop the blaming game and get on with your marriage if you are married. If not married and you are fighting, then you need to separate yourself from him. Nothing gets fixed because you both don't make an effort to fix them.
Please read the books!
ouch - still engaged?
sorry but men hate confrontation - try and read a good marriage book about communication - now!
It sounds as if you are ';miscommunicating'; and not truly understanding each other. You each need to respect each other's opinions and listen better before you react. If you can't do it on your own, find a good marriage conselor who can help you both. Best wishes!
I agree with broverman77.
If you plan on keeping this fellow around, then learn to Not share every opposing opinion and little hurt feeling.
Try to resolve your own issues independently. Try to say positive things around him.
He's definitely on the defensive, here....
His reaction, however inappropriate, is true. He has no idea how to fix the complaint, and he's too young to just go, ';Ok, hon.';
So he responds with the first thing out of his mouth, which,when interpreted, means: '; I have no clue what you just said or what the problem is. I have no clue how I am supposed to fix this for you....';
So do not verbalize negatives to him. Speak only positives.
Try to deal with things you percieve as as an ';issue'; independently.
Give the guy a break. I really don't think he has a clue as what to say to you.Why does he make a federal case out of everything I say???
I definitely would not have chosen this as best answer... but I guess ya snooze, ya lose... he's too young to just go ';ok hon';? Do you even know our ages??? Also, you were completely wrong in your assumptions. Sorry, but way off.
Report Abuse
Men don't communicate well. Once you accept that, life gets better.
We like to eat, sleep and fornicate. Not much else, really. The rest we do to meet one of the aforementioned objectives. Any man that tells you otherwise is either 1) lying or 2) delusional.
The thing you are doing wrong is waisting your time with the wrong person. It takes two to make a relationship work. And the word work is key. Relationships take a lot of work and a little bit of love each day. He is not willing and it hurting you. It is about control and he's got it. Move on, I know it hurts but you will be happier for it later with the right man.
Sounds like you are talking at each other instead of to each other. If you say rude and hurtful things to each other, why are you getting married, do you think it will get better? Maybe he has something else on his mind.
Opening your mouth.Try keeping your yap shut for once.And my ole lady just smacked me for that one!!
I would consider reading ';The Proper Care and Feeding of Marriage'; and ';The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands.';
I think both of you need to grow up and stop the fighting. The reasons why things don't get fixed is because you two can't be mature adults to work them. So, stop the blaming game and get on with your marriage if you are married. If not married and you are fighting, then you need to separate yourself from him. Nothing gets fixed because you both don't make an effort to fix them.
Please read the books!
ouch - still engaged?
sorry but men hate confrontation - try and read a good marriage book about communication - now!
It sounds as if you are ';miscommunicating'; and not truly understanding each other. You each need to respect each other's opinions and listen better before you react. If you can't do it on your own, find a good marriage conselor who can help you both. Best wishes!
Federal Case on Marijuana?
What was the major federal case that led to a doctor testifying that weed was detrimental and should be outlawed?
I don't remember what it was actually. If you remember the name of the doctor and the agent that submitted his affidavit regarding the case, please post that as well. Thanks.Federal Case on Marijuana?
I think you may be referring to the passing of the Marijuana Tax Act (1937), in which Harry J. Anslinger, commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, and not a medical doctor, testified to all sorts of outrageous lies, including, “Smoke a joint, and you’re likely to kill your brother,'; and calling marijuana the “deadliest drug ever known.'; His motive was racism. At that time marijuana use was relatively confined to the hispanic population in the south-west, and the mostly-black jazz scene in eastern cities. Anslinger testified that fifty percent of all violent crimes in the US were committed by blacks, Mexicans, etc., and could be traced directly to marijuana, when, in fact, 65 to 75% of all violent crimes committed in the US were (and still are) alcohol-related.
An actual medical doctor, Dr. James Woodward, testified on behalf of the American Medical Association, that ';there is no evidence that marijuana is a dangerous drug,'; and calling the whole fabric of federal testimony ';tabloid sensationalism.'; However, when the bill came up on the floor of Congress, one pertinent question was asked: “Did anyone consult with the AMA and get their opinion?'; Rep. Carl Vinson replied, “Yes, we have, a Dr. Wharton (a mispronunciation of Woodward) and the AMA are in complete agreement.” And with this bold-faced lie, the act was passed.
I don't remember what it was actually. If you remember the name of the doctor and the agent that submitted his affidavit regarding the case, please post that as well. Thanks.Federal Case on Marijuana?
I think you may be referring to the passing of the Marijuana Tax Act (1937), in which Harry J. Anslinger, commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, and not a medical doctor, testified to all sorts of outrageous lies, including, “Smoke a joint, and you’re likely to kill your brother,'; and calling marijuana the “deadliest drug ever known.'; His motive was racism. At that time marijuana use was relatively confined to the hispanic population in the south-west, and the mostly-black jazz scene in eastern cities. Anslinger testified that fifty percent of all violent crimes in the US were committed by blacks, Mexicans, etc., and could be traced directly to marijuana, when, in fact, 65 to 75% of all violent crimes committed in the US were (and still are) alcohol-related.
An actual medical doctor, Dr. James Woodward, testified on behalf of the American Medical Association, that ';there is no evidence that marijuana is a dangerous drug,'; and calling the whole fabric of federal testimony ';tabloid sensationalism.'; However, when the bill came up on the floor of Congress, one pertinent question was asked: “Did anyone consult with the AMA and get their opinion?'; Rep. Carl Vinson replied, “Yes, we have, a Dr. Wharton (a mispronunciation of Woodward) and the AMA are in complete agreement.” And with this bold-faced lie, the act was passed.
The federal government has recently tried to block evidence of its own witnesses in a case about the Species?
At Risk Act. Which animal鈥檚 habitat is at risk?The federal government has recently tried to block evidence of its own witnesses in a case about the Species?
Nooksack Dace, a species of minnowThe federal government has recently tried to block evidence of its own witnesses in a case about the Species?
NOOKSACK DACE
NOOKSACK DACE 4 radio trivia
Nooksack Dace is the answer for radio trivia
Nooksack Dace - worksunder eye concealer
Nooksack Dace, a species of minnowThe federal government has recently tried to block evidence of its own witnesses in a case about the Species?
NOOKSACK DACE
NOOKSACK DACE 4 radio trivia
Nooksack Dace is the answer for radio trivia
Nooksack Dace - works
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)